search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ACCESS DENIED


ineffective, the enemy will seek alternate materials and sources of supply to create employable systems.


Terefore, the Army must design future systems with two overarching goals in mind. Systems must provide a broad baseline capability, in this case detection, while maintaining maximum flexibil- ity for future modifications to counter emerging threats.


MODERNIZATION INITIATIVES Te Army is harvesting and modern- izing previously fielded equipment to meet near-term requirements for coun- tering the IED threat on the battlefield while planning for long-term moderniza- tion. Specifically, the Army is preparing HMDS for fielding to route clearance companies and brigade engineer bat- talions in the Army force structure. In conjunction with the engineer proponent at the U.S. Army Maneuver Support Cen- ter of Excellence (MSCoE), PM CCS has implemented deliberate


steps to retain


the current capability while keeping an eye on future improvements, to get the most value for the taxpayer’s investment.


Te Army is fielding HMDS in increments to allow future insertion of technolo- gies still in development. Tis approach permits the near-term integration of the initial capability into the operating force while allowing capability modernization in the future. Te initial increment will consist primarily of JUONS-fielded sys- tems with a ground-penetrating radar capability that are currently in theater. Te second increment will introduce the deep-buried detection capability, which will increase the system’s effectiveness in finding deeply buried metallic explo- sive hazards. Te final increment will add a semiautonomous capability allow- ing remote operation of HMDS, thus


34


SPIDER SETS THE STAGE


The Spider Networked Munition System, which has proven to be a highly effective force protection capability in OEF, provides munition field effectiveness equivalent to the capabilities provided by antipersonnel land mines, but without the life-threatening risks that persist after hostilities end. Future AD systems will need to provide a remote command-and-control capability similar to Spider’s, but at much longer ranges. They will also need to have scalable effects for escalation of force, from nonlethal to antipersonnel and anti-vehicle. (Photo courtesy of U.S. Army)


SEND IN THE HUSKY The Army is preparing the HMDS, shown here in use Sept. 24, 2013, by Marines with the 3rd Combat Engineer Battalion, for fielding to route clearance companies and brigade engineer bat- talions in its force structure. Fielding will be in increments, to allow future insertion of technologies still in development. (Photo by Cpl Austin Long, 2nd Marine Division)


Army AL&T Magazine


April–June 2014


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200