search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EXCHANGING PERSPECTIVES


EYE ON THE PRIZE Greene said the Army expects TWI offi- cers to go to their companies with their acquisition backgrounds, learn as much as possible, contribute and cooperate as full team members at the companies, making TWI “hopefully one of their best assign- ments.” Ten, he said, they are expected to bring some best practices back to the Army—not just for themselves but also for their leadership, peers and subordinates.


“Tey’re putting on their own acquisi- tion hat and looking at how their [TWI] company does business in a different way, possibly more efficient, more effective— maybe not—and then taking a step back and looking at acquisition and how we can do things differently.”


INSIDE INDUSTRY


TWI fellows meet Feb. 12 at the Microsoft Technology Center in Reston, VA, at the midpoint of their assignments to discuss progress, experiences, lessons learned and possible program improve- ments for future fellows. The fellows also took a tour of the center, which Microsoft, one of 10 companies involved in TWI, uses to provide customers with state-of-the-art business and technology solutions. (U.S. Army photo by Tara Clements)


Te Army’s deputy director for acqui- sition career management approves the selections.


“THIS EXPOSURE BENEFITS THE ARMY AS OFFICERS INCORPORATE INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICES INTO DOD PROCESSES AND THE COMPANIES GAIN CUSTOMER INSIGHT AND VALUABLE ADVICE ON THE DOD ACQUISITION PROCESS.”


130 Army AL&T Magazine


According to Scott Greene, chief of the Acquisition Education and Training Branch at the U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center (USAASC), there’s more “rigor” and a more challenging board process than in the past. “Two years ago, our selection rates were at 80-90 percent. Last year, they were at 50 percent. We expect this year to be in the 30-40 percent range, which is good. Tat means more people are applying for the positions, and it means that there’s more competition—and it means that the best officers are getting accepted.”


July–September 2014


Greene said that the TWI participant’s focus should be on immersion in the company’s culture and business prac- tices. Participants should also dedicate themselves completely to their assigned projects. An officer considering the TWI assignment as a “break” from normal duties has the wrong attitude, he said. “If you’re coming into it with the mindset that it’s a relief and you’re [going] to have more free time or knock out a bunch of training, that’s not the intent. Tis is sup- posed to be not only your best assignment, but it’s supposed to be a very challenging one, too,” Greene said.


INDUSTRY LEADERS Companies that partner with the Army in TWI


are developers of


innovative,


cutting-edge technologies as well as established leaders in their respective fields. Tose currently participating are Amazon, Boeing Co., Cisco Systems Inc., Coca-Cola, CSC, Airbus Group Inc., General Dynamics, Intel, Lockheed Martin Corp., and Microsoft Corp. Te acquisition officers get a wide range of experience in their respective companies,


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176