search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TWI PROFILES


TWI PROFILE: MAJ ANTHONY LEACH, AIRBUS GROUP INC.


OFF TO SEE HOW ‘THE WIZARD’ WORKS


MAJ Anthony Leach approached his rotation in Training with Industry (TWI), working with Airbus in Huntsville, AL, with


“Te Wizard of Oz” in mind. He wanted to “to see behind the cur- tain, to see how ‘the wizard’—our industry partners—operated. I wanted to learn if there were any differences to their methods of doing business versus the government’s.” He got that look.


Indeed, Leach was surprised that, while “there were many sim- ilarities with the Army” in the operations of Airbus Defence and Space, what seemed simple on the government side was significantly more complex on the contractor side. “Te big- gest difference I noticed was [that] when the government asks the contractor to modify something, whether [it is] hardware or contractual, it is not as easy as I assumed.”


His assumption had been that the government would “just ask the grand wizard, and [the modification] happened as long as there was money.” But what was a “so-called ‘simple modifica- tion’ ” from the Army’s point of view was a bit more complex for the contractor.


A NEW LANGUAGE


“It takes, I would guess, four to six months to gain a feel for the difference between how government operates and how industry operates,” said John Burke, Leach’s TWI liaison at Airbus. Burke, former project manager for unmanned aircraft systems, retired from the Army in 2007. “An officer will continue for a while to try to reconcile if Task A in industry is just like Task A in the govern- ment, and then they realize it may have the same task name, but definition and approach are quite a bit different,” Burke said.


It was Burke’s experience in Army acquisition that prompted him to establish the TWI program at Airbus Defence and Space. Leach was the company’s fourth TWI officer. “My experience in the Army is that missions are defined by task and purpose,” Burke said. “Tat’s how commanders state a mission: Here’s the task, and here’s the purpose. In industry, once you have a task and purpose, you convert that into specifications, schedules, pricing and eventually a contract to execute. And I think the one big difference is how you assess and define risk between the government and the industry side.”


With these differences in execution and the complexities of each business group, Leach found that integrating himself into the inner workings of the company would take more than the year that the TWI program allowed. But the leadership and the integration processes within Airbus Defence and Space made adapting to the corporate culture seamless, Leach said. “When you’ve worked in the acquisition workforce, there’s a lot of inter- action with your industry partners. Te toughest part was trying to figure out what to wear to work every day,” he said.


EXPERIENCE IT ALL Leach said he went to Airbus with “a plan to rotate to each busi- ness area of the company. I wanted to see how each operated. I expected to see and receive some great leadership, and that’s what I saw during my tenure.”


“Every one of our TWI officers has a portfolio of projects that they work,” said Burke. In addition, TWI officers rotate through different functional areas at Airbus. “When they leave the TWI program the following summer, they’ve had exposure to logistics and engineering, production, scheduling and plan- ning, finishing with finance and contracts.


“Two of our TWI officers were degreed engineers … and we had both of those officers work some urgent and important engineer- ing issues. One of the officers was an expert in program planning and control, and he focused on program planning and control and program analysis. We had another officer who was an expert in strategic communications and strategic program definition, which were essential for a project for us.” Leach, a career logisti- cian with a contracting background, worked directly with the logistics chief and, without representing Airbus on any business transactions, had input into managing the turn time for a time- and-materials contract, Burke said.


CLOSE TO THE ACTION When Leach applied for TWI, Airbus was still EADS – North America (EADS-NA). EADS had been in talks about merging with BAE Systems, one of its major shareholders. But that plan was scuttled, and two other major EADS shareholders, Daim- lerChrysler Aerospace AG and Lagardère,


sold their shares.


140


Army AL&T Magazine


July–September 2014


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176