search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


Sending voice, video, and images via the SRW, sensors such as Unattended Ground Sensors, Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle robots, and Class 1 unmanned aircraft instantaneously disseminated infor- mation across the force. In addition, the NIKs showed an ability to view and share the sensor information in real time on Blue Force Tracking display screens in vehicles on-the- move. WIN-T then beamed the images over longer distances.


The data were shown on a Command Post of the Future display screen,


a battle command application that organizes and displays a wealth of relevant battlefield information.


The U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) assigned a 32- person team with 21 data collectors and observers to the exercise; the command is preparing an executive summary of its findings.


“We will continue to learn from this type of exercise. This is not an isolated event, and our success here provides tremendous momentum moving forward. We are going to


continue this. ATEC has been a key contributor to this process,” said LTG William N. Phillips, Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology (ASAALT). “This is a real Army Team effort!”


KRIS OSBORN is a Highly Qualified Expert for the ASAALT Office of Strategic Communications. He holds a B.A. in English and political science from Kenyon College and an M.A. in comparative literature from Columbia University.


Technical Support Facility, Fort Hood, TX; the Future Force Integration Directorate; and personnel from the WSMR and APG installations.


Stressing the Network At WSMR, Soldiers maneuvered vari- ous platforms at vast distances away from one another to see if they could maintain network connectivity. The network was stressed during the numer- ous operational vignettes and in the


diverse temperatures, environments, and altitudes of White Sands.


The Army’s three network wave- forms were established based on the amount of information passed across each, said Rick Cozby, PEO Integration’s Associate Director for Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Testing. Smaller echelons share less information, which


reduces bandwidth requirements. This allows Soldiers to operate successfully with smaller, more portable radios than those needed at higher echelons.


In today’s tactical environment, the Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) oper- ates at the lowest level, providing information to individual Soldiers or teams within a company.


As echelon levels increase, more tactical data are shared, and the large communi- cations pipe of Wideband Networking Waveform (WNW) is required. Connect- ivity is achieved through an aerial layer using JTRS attached to unmanned aircraft systems and other components such as airships and Rapid Aerostat Initial Deployment towers.


The Network Centric Waveform (NCW) is the satellite layer. It allows warfighters to access the Internet and share voice, video, and data around the globe.


MG John Bartley, Program Executive Officer Integration, concludes a VIP tour during the BCT Integration Exercise on July 15, 2010, at APG. (U.S. Army photo by Joshua Davidson.)


9 OCTOBER –DECEMBER 2010


Today, WIN-T Increment 1 provides warfighters at battalion level and above with the ability to connect to the Army’s digitized systems, voice, data, and video via satellite. WIN-T Increment 2 will build upon these capabilities by extend- ing satellite communications down to the company level and providing


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76