search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


RADAR WARNING


ARAT and joint service reprogramming centers established common obstacles in software and threat simulations across services in August 2023—for example, keeping up with evolving radar threats for simulation purposes, illustrated here with the ARAT Electronic Warfare Radar Warning Receiver Laboratory Test Cart. (Photo by Kevin Deegan, CECOM ARAT)


forces,” said Matthew Bernhardt, associate director for SEC’s Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Sensors Directorate.


CONCLUSION Treats are ever-changing. Highlighted in the tri-service working group was ARAT’s Simulation Modeling Framework (SMF), a game-changing solution that facilitates threat simulation sharing by standardiz- ing the format in which simulations are constructed. With minimal constraints, SMF empowers simulation builders to model threats as they operate in real-world scenarios, enabling simulations to adapt and “pace the threat” as it evolves. SMF is revolutionizing the simulation landscape across reprogramming centers, govern- ment organizations and potentially the broader industry, and driving a paradigm shift in how threat simulations are created, shared and utilized.


Teamwork will continue to prove critical as the tri-service working group estab- lishes a centralized repository and fosters an environment of open communication and information sharing. Tis approach is expected to help maintain readiness among the increased complexity of enemy threats, reduce response times to emerg- ing threats and foster progress toward joint force efforts supporting large-scale combat operations.


Te tri-service working group plans to meet again in March 2025. Its agenda includes gathering input on best practices and continuing to build a robust and effi- cient repository to support simulation sharing and overall collaboration efforts.


ARAT and the Project Management Office for Aircraft Survivability Equip- ment also plan to initiate an O-6 level forum. Tis forum’s goal is to get lead- ership buy-in and will supplement the


reprogramming working group advocacy and decision-making, while also includ- ing a hardware-related scope.


For more information about CECOM SEC, go to cecom.army.mil/SEC.


KEVIN DEEGAN provides specialist contract


support to CECOM as a strategic communications


at Aberdeen


Proving Ground, Maryland. He holds a B.A. in journalism from Temple University and is certified as a Project Management Professional.


ROBERT “KRIS” KNOPP is the Systems Engineering and Integration branch chief and chief engineer for the Army SEC’s ARAT Program Office at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. He holds a B.S. in physics and mathematics from Randolph- Macon College.


https://asc.ar my.mil


59


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104