search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CHANGING CULTURE


proven that the 5-I Model works, and the ODASA(P) is on the verge of reaping simi- lar benefits. Tis reform must be carefully coordinated to ensure many stakehold- ers are included. It must be able to adapt to the rapidly changing modern acquisi- tion environment. As AMC and the Army operationalize contracting, organizations must be better equipped to see themselves. More can be explored, such as rewriting AFARS Appendix BB to include some of these concepts and perhaps even merging it with Appendix CC. Other Army audit- ing programs could connect with each other to reduce redundancy and improve efficiencies.


TAKING A STEP TOWARDS EFFICIENCY


By implementing and analyzing a step-by-step plan, proven best practices and areas of improvements can be more easily identified, resulting in a more efficient and timely procurement process. (Photo by RDNE Stock project, Pexels)


the Army Medical Command. Te PMR Roadshows discussed the benefits of the 5-I Model and explained the changes the ODASA(P) made to incorporate it. One change was the rewriting of the AFARS Appendix CC to include inspection, iden- tification, improvement and integration concepts.


Tese concepts were included by more clearly defining the types of PMRs. A PMR Type 1 now includes actions taken at the lowest level to ensure internal controls are considered. Actions like peer review, document review and legal review are now conceptualized as inspections. Tis is a positive thing because findings from larger audits can be integrated into these low-level inspections, creating opportu- nities to identify and improve early. A second change was the development of an


66 Army AL&T Magazine Winter 2025


automated CAP process and the estab- lishment of quarterly checkpoints for all enterprise partners. Te CAP process and quarterly checkpoints included the itera- tive concept by establishing a mechanism and battle rhythm for trend analysis. Trend analysis is crucial to ensure improvement is sustained. Now the ODASA(P) and its enterprise partners can hold each other accountable via data. If data trends posi- tively, proven practices can be extrapolated and shared amongst the enterprise. If data trends negatively, corrective actions can be adjusted early to change the trajectory of the issue.


CONCLUSION Te PMR program must evolve from a reactive after-award evaluation to a pre- award integrated process focused on near-real-time results. ACC-APG has


Regardless of whether the process is related to PMR, OIP, command inspec- tions, RMIC Program, etc., the 5-I Model can help distill steps and align them for efficiency and resource preservation. It is natural for people to resist change, mostly out of fear, especially if it is complex change. Te simple framework of the 5-I Model can alleviate those fears and make change more impactful. At the end of the day, it’s the mission and the warfighter that matter. Ensuring we get quality and timely products and services to meet Army prior- ities is paramount.


For more information, contact the author at david.a.chiola.civ@army.mil.


DAVID A. CHIOLA is a procurement analyst at ACC-APG. He holds an M.S. in contract management from the Naval Postgraduate School and a B.S. in business from the Richard Stockton College of New Jersey (now Stockton University). He is a DAWIA certified Contracting Professional, a Practitioner in program management and is an Army Acquisition Corps member.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104