search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE WEIGHT THING


We went into “gram management mode” to monitor


the


technical performance measurement of the weight in each sub- component. (Yes, there are 454 of those little grams in a single pound.) We spent millions of dollars in component redesign.


Our little Javelin project slipped 50 percent in its advanced-development schedule and more than doubled its advanced-development costs—in large part because of weight- reduction redesigns throughout the entire system (though we did indeed have other technical challenges to contend with). (See Figure 2.) Naturally, that threw off all of the funding allo- cations tied to the program objective memorandum- and future years defense program schedule funding, and necessitated for- mal program re-baselining with congressional assistance to “re-color” the money.


Eventually, redesigned components arrived for assembly. So along the way, as development moved to completion, we had a mixed bag of about seven different Javelin configurations with substantial differences among them—a complication for testing and evaluation, reliability analysis and scoring, etc. Tese all settled down to one final configuration by the time operational testing rolled around. We used the extra schedule to fully test these subcomponents as they came in, to be sure we hadn’t sacri- ficed other important properties when we shaved off the weight. As a result, system-level testing went off without a hitch. And we came in just under the 49.5-pound threshold.


WHAT – AGAIN … ? Later, as product manager of the Joint Advanced Special Opera- tions Radio System, I inherited a radio program that also had weight as a KPP. And I once again found it to be a challenge.


During the technology maturation phase, while receiving a briefing on a completed and functional 21-pound multiband transceiver prototype that was


supposed to get down to 10


pounds in coming months, our prime contractor indicated that it was going to lose weight by making things more compact inside.


+ HOW TO TACKLE A WEIGHTY ISSUE


By keeping an eye on weight requirements early in a program, acquisition professionals can ensure that Soldier load remains bearable and program requirements stay on track, financially and schedule-wise. (Image courtesy of the author)


Te radio largely consisted of five densely populated Standard Electronic Module, Format E cards with a planned reduc- tion to only two. Having the benefit of the Javelin experience behind me, I knew what question to ask: “How much do the three cards being eliminated weigh?” Te answer was 2 pounds each—not at all adding up to the 11 pounds we had to lose—and eyes in the audience began to widen. “Great, now how are we going to lose the other 5 pounds?” I asked. For a moment—just a very brief one—I was the smartest soul in the


138


Army AL&T Magazine


April-June 2018


SOLDIER’S LOAD


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168