search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PLANS TAKING FLIGHT


CH-47 Chinook, HH-60 and UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter crews of the 1st Air Cavalry Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division take off Jan. 25 for their tactical assembly area inside the Hohenfels Training Area Airfield, Germany. The crews were part of Allied Spirit VIII, a multinational training exercise focusing on tactical interoperability and secure communications among NATO alliance members. “The U.S. military is not ready for the threats we face today,” said Paul Scharre, senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security. “In a major power war, we will be required to innovate on timelines of months, not years. And we must have these processes of innovation in place today.” (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Gregory T. Summers, 22nd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment)


Te fundamental difference that the new command is intended to make—to bring the stakeholders under “one roof” to make decisions that will produce effec- tive, achievable, affordable capabilities and requirements rapidly and thus get the products to the warfighter fast—lies in the cross-functional teams, each led by a military or civilian leader from the operational side of the Army. Each cross- functional team has representatives from requirements


development, program


management, science and technology (S&T), test and evaluation, resourcing, contracting and sustainment, as well as U.S. Forces Command and, as needed, Army service component commands, the operational organizations that serve as Army components for combatant commands.


Te teams, which report to the undersec- retary of the Army and the vice chief of staff, will seek industry and academia’s


involvement early in the process of devel- oping solutions to get their input on potential private-sector solutions avail- able or in development.


Experimentation and technical demon- strations, will also be integral to the cross-functional teams’ capability devel- opment process, involving Soldiers to help determine if a solution will actu- ally work, as needed, well before the Army decides to acquire or develop it. In remarks Oct. 10 at AUSA, Gen. Mark A. Milley, Army chief of staff, described this “significant streamlining of processes” as a


“shift to a SOCOM [U.S. Special Opera- tions Command]-like model of buy, try, decide and acquire, rather than the cur- rent, industrial-age, linear model that takes


years to establish requirements,


decades to test and may take a long, long time to go from idea to delivery.”


Among experienced practitioners of rapid acquisition, hopes are high that the command will succeed, but there are caveats. Te command will require a well-defined independence and author- ity, said Peter Newell, who directed the Army’s Rapid Equipping Force (REF)


“Our modernization strategy is now on a curve of diminishing returns.” —Undersecretary of the Army Ryan D. McCarthy


HTTPS: / /ASC.ARMY.MIL 13


ARMY AL&T


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168