MODERNIZING ARMY MODERNIZATION
FORMULA 809 D
evelopment of the futures command and cross- functional teams is taking place against the backdrop
of a sweeping, independent, congressio- nally mandated review of how to speed up DOD acquisition and a major push within Army acquisition to stream- line processes using authorities already available through recent legislation.
Te “Report of the Advisory Panel on Streamlining
and Codifying Acqui-
sition Regulations,” known as the Section 809 Panel, from the FY16 authorizing legislation, envisions an acquisition system built around posi- tive outcomes—the timely delivery of warfighting capabilities—not perfect adherence to processes.
In January, the 17-member panel released the first of three volumes of observations and recommendations based on its dis- cussions with hundreds of stakeholders from industry, think tanks, DOD and other entities. Volume 1 introduces the concept of the “dynamic marketplace,” an alternative approach to acquisition that would make it easier for DOD to respond quickly to changes in global security threats and make it harder for competing powers to offset U.S. mili- tary capabilities.
Te current acquisition system is inflex- ible and fails to differentiate between dissimilar products or services, such as a major defense acquisition program versus a basic commodity, the panel found. Further, it’s a cost-centric sys- tem whereby DOD often equates the
Te panel identified five essential
attributes of a future outcome-based acquisition system:
• Competitive and collaborative. • Adaptive and responsive. • Transparent. • Time-sensitive. • Allows for trade-offs.
Te panel’s “dynamic marketplace” is the result when DOD achieves these attributes—particularly effective col- laboration within DOD, with industry, and with warfighters who can articu- late problems, select the best solutions offered by industry for testing and save time in requirements development.
“An inability or unwillingness to col- laborate with industry results in DOD lacking awareness of the full range of available potential solutions; creates barriers for nontraditional contractors to enter the defense marketplace; and results in DOD acquiring suboptimal products, services, and solutions,” the report stated. “DOD must foster col- laborative partnerships across the entire
cost of a product or service with the risk of an acquisition, assigning arbi- trary dollar thresholds in the form of acquisition categories that dictate the level of decision-making, the processes themselves and the degree of oversight. Inflexibility leads to unnecessary delays in getting warfighters what they need. Te acquisition workforce has neither the incentive nor the encouragement to make decisions, much less take risk, the report stated.
marketplace to accomplish its mission today and in the future.”
Within Army acquisition, Lt. Gen. Paul A. Ostrowski, principal military deputy to the assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, logistics and technology and director of the Army Acquisition Corps, has spearheaded a campaign to educate and motivate the Army Acquisi- tion Workforce to seek ways of speeding delivery of capabilities by scaling down the processes involved. Ostrowski has visited program executive offices around the country. His message? To serve the Soldier, change the culture. Tools exist to simplify acquisition without special permission.
Te current process has “put us in a position where we no longer can keep up with the threat and we no longer can keep up with the advances in technol- ogy with the speed at which they are turning,” Ostrowski told an audience at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, in December.
He outlined steps to simplify acquisi- tion during a presentation in January at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, saying that Army acquisition has to “make it such that Soldiers are as force-protected, as lethal and as situationally aware that we can possibly make them because we owe that to them. Changing the culture is not hard in mind, because each and every one of you sitting in this room today … you care about Soldiers. And this is about affecting Soldiers.”
—MS. MARGARET C. ROTH
18
Army AL&T Magazine
April-June 2018
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168
