search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
D


r. Jacques S. Gansler chaired the Commission on Army Acquisition and Program Management in Expedition-


ary Operations, appointed by then-Secretary of the Army Pete Geren in 2007 to review the lessons learned in recent operations and to provide forward-looking recom- mendations to ensure that future military operations would achieve greater effective- ness, efficiency, and transparency.


The


Gansler Commission, as it is known, assessed processes and explored legislative solutions to ensure that the Army is properly equipped for future expeditionary operations, and in October 2007 released its pivotal report. This Q&A is reprinted and updated with permission from ACC Today magazine (http://www.acc.army.mil/today/).


Q. The Army has had about four years to implement the recommendations made by the Gansler Commission. What is your assessment of the Army’s progress toward implementing the recommendations?


A. Our final report lists “Four Key Ele- ments to Future Success (see sidebar on Page 105). Points 1 and 2 are well on the way to being completely implemented. Point 3, with respect to providing train- ing and tools, still needs further work. Point 4, with respect to obtaining legis- lative, regulatory, and policy assistance, I believe is moving slowly, and I don’t feel there is sufficient push at the Army Secre- tariat level.


Q. The commission recommended that the Army should “establish a separate, centrally managed Contracting Corps (not Branch) for Army military and civil- ian contracting personnel.” What’s your assessment of the Army’s efforts regarding this recommendation?


A. The purpose of this recommenda- tion was to separate contracting from


AN ESSENTIAL ROLE


The Gansler Commission report focused heavily on improving the stature and increasing the quantity of contracting personnel, both military and civilian. Here, MAJ Isaac Torres of the 413th Contracting Support Brigade, Contract Officer for Exercise Garuda Shield, meets with a local Indonesian vendor to discuss materials needed to complete the humanitarian civic action project in Situ Gede, during the exercise in June 2011. Sponsored by U.S. Army Pacific and hosted by the Indonesian armed forces, Garuda Shield is an annual, bilateral exercise. (Photo by SPC Elizabeth Cole.)


acquisition. The establishment of the Army Contracting Command was an extremely positive step. However, in terms of promotion boards, career paths, etc., I believe contracting is still part of the acqui- sition area and is not a “separate” corps. One of the purposes for recommend- ing the establishment of a major-general director of the Army Contracting Corps was to get at this recommendation.


Q. The Commission on Wartime Con- tracting released its report in August 2011. Your committee released its report four years ago. What have you observed dur- ing the past four years that you hoped the CWC would include in its report?


A. The CWC incorporates into its report [Transforming Wartime Contracting: Con- trolling Costs, Reducing Risks, online at http://www.wartimecontracting.gov/] recommendations to completely imple- ment “The Four Key Elements to Future Success” listed in our report. Also, as I stated in my recent testimony to the CWC, they should emphasize the impor- tance of the government’s contracting workforce, but not (as their report was


titled) focus on “the risk” of contractors, who are an essential element of expedi- tionary operations.


Q. An outcome of the Gansler Com- mission was the creation of the Army Contracting Command, which includes the Expeditionary Contracting Command for support in contingency environments. What are your thoughts on how the Army Contracting Command and Expedition- ary Contracting Command are doing?


A. In our report, we did not recommend that the Life Cycle Management Com- mand acquisition centers be assigned to the Contracting Command. We recom- mended that the Contracting Command be given directive authority. The Army Materiel Command has assigned the LCMC acquisition centers to the Con- tracting Command.


My concerns are that the issues involved with procuring major weapon systems dilute the Contracting Command’s focus on contingency and expeditionary con- tracting. During our deliberations, this was a very contentious point on which


ASC.ARMY.MIL 103


CONTRACTING


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180