MODERNIZATION:
WHERE THE ARMY WENT WRONG by Dr. Loren B. Thompson
A
rmies at war are not noted for frugality or vision on the home front. When Soldiers’ lives are on the line, their needs are met
first and military leaders worry about other matters later.
But the fact that America’s Army has been at war for 10 straight years—much of that time on multiple fronts—doesn’t fully explain what went wrong with the modernization of Cold War weapons inventories during the first decade of the new millennium.
AVIATION MOVES FORWARD
The Army’s aviation assets have weathered past modernization mistakes well, Thompson believes, with “a lot of life” left in the Apache, Black Hawk, Chinook, and Kiowa helicopters and the Army dedicated to continuing incremental improvements to the fleet. Here, an AH-64D Apache Longbow lands after demonstrating its capabilities in the Manned Unmanned Systems Integration Capability Exercise conducted at Dugway Proving Ground, UT, in September 2011. (Photo by SPC Latoya Wiggins.)
The service proved it could meet the needs of Soldiers under fire fast as long as it had access to endless amounts of money. Efforts to respond to urgent challenges, such as improvised explosive devices, unfolded with impressive rapidity, and the force proved it was capable of adapting despite being chronically overextended.
But meanwhile, plans to equip the “Army After Next”—the force of the future— made little progress, exhibiting about as much rigor as the Ottoman military, circa 1913. What went wrong?
UNSTABLE REQUIREMENTS The problem wasn’t lack of money. Under the Bush administration, the Army’s base budget increased steadily despite the fact that the cost of overseas contingencies was covered separately by emergency supple- mental appropriations. The real problem, it seems, lay in a failure to anticipate how threats were changing and to identify a stable set of requirements to guide long- term modernization plans.
This is the precise opposite of what hap- pened in the early post-Vietnam era, when
ASC.ARMY.MIL
145
COMMENTARY
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180