search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
$ FIGURE 3 MORE BANG FOR WHICH BUCKS?


The Army applies should-cost to seven target acquisition processes in which programs may be active during any phase in the acquisition life cycle. Should-cost initiatives targeting contracting activities in FY15 yielded much greater cost savings and avoidance than all other acquisition activities combined. PARCA’s next step is to take a closer look at the results, to determine if opportunities for implementing initiatives in other phases of the life cycle are being overlooked. (SOURCE: OASA(ALT) PARCA)


KEY


Reqts: Overst: Ctr:


200 154.5 150


Requirements of the JCIDS Oversight and review Contracting


Prod:


Log: T&E:


Product deliverables, such as production and delivery of equipment and systems engineering


Logistics and sustainment Test and evaluation


100


50 6.6 0 Reqts Overst Ctr Prod Log SHOULD-COST INITIATIVES


moves forward with new programs such as the Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle and Joint Air-Ground Missile, both of which successfully accomplished MS B decisions in 2015 and will begin report- ing in 2016?


CONCLUSION Without question, should-cost man- agement is an accepted best practice throughout the Army’s acquisition enter- prise. As a BBP initiative, it receives constant command emphasis from lead- ership in the Army and OSD.


Should-cost is also a very successful BBP initiative. Since its initial implementa- tion in 2012, the Army has documented $2.2 billion in cost savings. Programs that execute successful should-cost ini- tiatives are able to reinvest the savings back into their programs, allowing some


programs to buy down risk and oth- ers to procure greater quantities. Tus, should-cost as a BBP initiative impacts both affordability and productivity or efficiency.


Moving forward, ASA(ALT)’s goal is to streamline and simplify planning and reporting will-cost/should-cost initiatives for the PEOs and project managers. In addition, ASA(ALT) is working closely with the other services and National Defense University to increase should- cost training for all members of the Army acquisition enterprise.


For more information, contact Dale Fletcher at dale.n.fletcher.civ@mail.mil or Michael Lebrun at michael.e.lebrun2. civ@mail.mil.


T&E Other 4.6


40.3 26.6 21.9 1.2


MR. MICHAEL E. LEBRUN is the PARCA director in OASA(ALT). He holds an M.A. in political science from the University of Maryland College Park, an M.S. in national resource management from the Industrial College of the Armed Forces and a B.S. in foreign service from Georgetown University. He is a member of the Army Acquisition Corps (AAC) with Level III certification in program management.


MR. DALE N. FLETCHER is PARCA’s should-cost manager. He holds an M.S. in cost analysis from the Air Force Institute of Technology and a B.S. in mathematics from Chicago State University. He is an AAC member with Level III certifications in cost


estimating, financial manage- ment and program management. + ASC.ARMY.MIL 105


BBP 3.0


DOLLAR VALUE OF COST SAVINGS IN MILLIONS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172