search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
warfighter and supports


the U.S.-India


Defense Technology and Trade Initiative,” he explained. “Te agreement required intense coordination between DOD and the India Ministry of Defense, which resulted in the agreement being developed at an unprecedented pace.”


What do you do in your position, and why is it important to the Army or the warfighter?


I negotiate and develop ICRDA agree- ments that enable the Army to provide materiel solutions to the warfighter. Te goal is to ensure that Soldiers have the best tools at their disposal, and often those tools are developed in cooperation with a U.S. ally.


How did you become part of the Army Acquisition Workforce, and why?


After working several years as an inter- national policy and agreements specialist for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, I had an oppor- tunity to join the Army Acquisition Workforce supporting DASA(DE&C), an organization whose personnel I regularly coordinated with and respected for their expertise. Ultimately, I applied for and was offered a position working as an agree- ments negotiator, which is the position I hold now.


What do you see as the most important points in your career with the Army Acquisition Workforce, and why?


Obtaining my Level III DAWIA certifi- cation in program management was an important accomplishment. Certification training provided me with a better under- standing of DODI 5000.02, “Operation of the Defense Acquisition System,” and how the development of ICRDA agree- ments plays a part in the acquisition life


cycle. From materiel solution analysis to production and deployment to operations and support, international cooperative agreements can have an impact on each phase of the life cycle. In addition to being able to potentially satisfy joint acquisition requirements, the cooperation conducted under international agreements enables resource sharing and reduces redundancy in effort, which saves both nations money and time.


Can you name a particular mentor or mentors who helped you in your career? How did they help you? Have you been a mentor?


Te former deputy director of the Interna- tional Armaments Cooperation Directorate at DASA(DE&C). Even before I joined DASA(DE&C), he was someone I could reach out to for advice. When I got the opportunity to work directly with him on a daily basis, I was able to learn more in two years than I had in the previous four work- ing for another organization. Te former deputy director took his craft seriously and always took time to ensure that he provided the agreements team with opportunities for professional development, whether that be sharing lessons learned, notifying the team of changes to regulations and the agree- ments development process, or encouraging his staff to continue DAWIA training and certification. I haven’t had an opportunity to serve as a mentor yet, but would love to someday mentor someone new to the inter- national agreements development process.


In addition to knowing that your work contributes to mission success for the warfighter, what’s the greatest satisfac- tion you have in being a part of the Army Acquisition Workforce?


I really value being a part of a specialized community with unique skill sets that have an impact on the Army as a whole;


however, the greatest satisfaction I have in being a part of the Army Acquisition Workforce is providing assistance to the warfighter. As a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom, I fully understand the importance of having the material capa- bilities required to perform your job. As a civilian, I like to think that I aid the effort to provide the warfighter with what they need through development of ICRDA agreements. Te cooperation afforded by international agreements helps fulfill warfighter requirements and, at the same time, allows the U.S. Army to leverage foreign funding and technology. Tat represents tremendous cost savings for the United States, which is significant, consid- ering current defense budget constraints.


If you could break the rules or make the rules, what would you change or do?


Although the international agreements we develop enable cost-sharing with our foreign partners, funding sometimes can be a challenge—especially when there is no money allocated for collaborative proj- ects. If I could change anything, I would increase the number of programs that offer research and development funds to help kick-start new projects and keep them running until proponents are able to fund and sustain those projects.


What advice would you give to some- one who aspires to a career similar to yours?


Although your career path may not directly lead you to where you want to be, stay motivated and continue to strive for opportunities to perform work that inter- ests you, and chances are you will find a job that will provide you with both per- sonal and professional fulfillment.


—MS. SUSAN L. FOLLETT


ASC.ARMY.MIL


13


ACQUISITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172