search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
“Te hardest part of my job is also the best part,” he added. “Every requirement met allows new capabilities to be con- sidered, which then drives a new set of requirements. It requires us to constantly innovate, which is exciting.”


What do you do in your position, and why is it important to the Army or the warfighter?


I work with the requirements and acqui- sition community to provide improved power and energy capabilities for the Army. Tese include lighter-weight alter- natives for wearable Soldier use and more resilient electrical grids for basing appli- cations. Specifically, this involves solving technical hurdles related to developing and transitioning prototype systems. Tis includes developing the engineering and scientific tools required to design a mili- tary-relevant system, and a combination of experimental characterization and simulation.


What’s the greatest satisfaction you have in being a part of the Army Acqui- sition Workforce (AAW)?


Although we leverage a large amount of commercial solutions, our requirements drive us to develop advanced technology. Tis results in us advancing the state of the art, which is very satisfying, as it not only benefits the warfighter but poten- tially the economic strength of the nation.


During your tenure with your organiza- tion or command, what was the biggest challenge your program faced, and how did you overcome it?


Early on in the program, there was a requirement for a form factor that could be worn on the tactical vest while meet- ing power requirements. No other fuel system had been able to provide this


capability. Based on Soldier feedback and rapid prototyping, it was possible to develop a product that met this require- ment. Te potential weight saving is impressive—almost


four times lighter


for extended missions than the existing rechargeable battery. Tis translates into a battery weight savings of 14 pounds and enables fielding of Soldier systems that provide increased capability but usu- ally require larger amounts of power.


If you could break the rules or make the rules, what would you change or do?


I would simplify the contracting pro- cess. Presently the contracting process is too long, making it hard to partner with innovative companies that thrive in fast- moving, agile partnerships.


You joined the AAW from the private sector. What do you see as the biggest dif- ference between working in the private sector and working in Army acquisition?


Actually, the research and development [R&D] environment is more similar than different. In my corporate position, the largest focus was on increasing share- holder value, which usually translated into developing useful products for customers. In the Army, the largest focus is on pro- viding value to the warfighter—in other words, transitioning useful products.


What one skill or ability is most impor- tant in doing your job effectively?


Perseverance. Te R&D process takes a long time. Also, DOD is a big organi- zation, and it’s not simple to affect the course of a big organization. To effect meaningful change, you have to be com- mitted for the long haul.


Is there a skill that you learned out- side your present career


that has ASC.ARMY.MIL 67


come in handy in your work for Army acquisition?


Communication skills. Air Liquide is a French multinational corporation, and when I worked there, I realized the impor- tance of learning from folks with different experiences. Tis was important because transitioning a product successfully requires consideration of a number of dif- ferent stakeholders.


Can you name a particular mentor or mentors who helped you in your career? How did they help you?


Tere are far too many people to men- tion who have provided mentoring to me. Te entire Power Division has been very helpful, which makes work an enjoyable experience. Especially helpful was the focus on transitioning technology—in other words, how will this help the Sol- dier? Sometimes that means pointing out problems and then going the extra mile in providing ideas and guidance on the solutions. It also helps that we have world experts in our technology space, specifi- cally power and energy.


What advice would you give to someone who aspires to a career similar to yours?


Plan your work, and then work your plan hard. As much as you can control it, all your work should have an end product that you believe will improve something. Tis means getting lots of feedback and separating the hype from the reality. Also, set up and achieve milestones to ensure forward progress: a requirement, a test bed, a technical report, a patent, a prototype, etc. Finally, be flexible. Being a scientist or an engineer includes inventing, and some- times you have to reinvent yourself.


—MS. SUSAN L. FOLLETT


SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172