search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


One of the AL&T-D’s primary respon- sibilities is to support the integration and accountability of newly fielded equipment. These efforts have many moving pieces, including planning and coordination for life support, facilities, communications, shipping/receiving of equipment, personnel support, and sustainment planning. AL&T-D’s abili- ties not only provide U.S. Forces-Iraq (USF-I) a substantial benefit, but also provide the program executive office (PEO)/program manager (PM) a “no cost” initial entry point for essential fielding coordination.


The Beginning Coordination for all fieldings within theater begins and ends with the USF-I J3 Force Modernization Division and its direct coordination with the U.S. divisions (USDs) to ensure appropriate coordination in support of the warfighter mission. Fielding coordination is initiated with the Notification of Intent, by the PM, to field in the ITO. This action triggers subsequent planning meetings that include USF-I, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for AL&T Liaison Officer, and AFSB AL&T-D. Once planning begins, several key tasks and common issues arise (see Figure 1 on Page 69). Through the use of the AFSB, the PEO/PM can support the overall intent: to meet the warfighting commanders’ requirements while filling resource gaps with the receipt and retention of essential assets.


Pre-Execution Documentation Within the fielding process, essential pre-execution documentation is nec- essary for a successful fielding. This documentation includes a Technology Development Plan (TDP), which is provided by the PM to ensure essen- tial fielding information is available; a Memorandum of Notification, where the specific fielding requirements are outlined; and a distribution plan that provides a picture and description of the system being fielded, a fielding plan


68 JULY –SEPTEMBER 2010


CWO4 Darren L. Cook (left), BLST Chief for the 172nd Infantry Brigade (Bde), works with SFC Wendoly D. Portillo, 172nd Infantry Bde PBO Noncommissioned Officer-in-Charge, and CWO2 Tuajuanna N. Jones, 172nd Infantry Bde Property Book Officer, as the unit resets equipment in preparation for future deployment. (U.S. Army photo by Summer Barkley, 402nd AFSB.)


summary (including sustainment), and the prioritized unit/division distribu- tion. Once this information is provided, a fielding schedule is determined and coordinated among the various USDs.


Accountability Accountability of Theater-Provided Equipment (TPE) is managed by the Theater Property Book Office (TPBO). In the 402nd AFSB, the TPBO Cell is collocated with the 2nd Battalion (Bn) and includes a chief warrant officer as the Accountable Officer, a govern- ment civilian employee appointed as Deputy Accountable Officer, and additional contracted Property Book and Unit Supply Enhanced (PBUSE) technicians. There are 13 TPB teams in the ITO supporting units with TPE property accountability. All TPE


must be documented on the TPB, and PMs are required to establish a hand receipt account within PBUSE. Before equipment is brought into theater, it is imperative that PMs populate equip- ment to be fielded into PBUSE using derivative unit identification codes. The TPBO is a tremendous asset and can provide a list of unit TPB accounts, a sample Department of the Army Form 3161 Lateral Transfer, and a point of contact (POC) list of all TPB offices in the country. The relationship between the warfighter and AFSB provides the PEO/PM timely and manageable accountability of fielded equipment, thus supporting their ability to execute schedule and cost requirements flaw- lessly (per 402nd AFSB AL&T External Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), July 31, 2007).


Using an internal asset known as the AL&T-D, the AFSB can provide coordination between the warfighter and the materiel developer to facilitate all fielding tasks and coordinate with external entities.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96