search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
F


or six weeks this summer, the Army tested its tactical network the way an Army network should be tested—in a completely inte-


grated manner, using Soldiers conducting realistic missions to determine performance.


We went to White Sands Missile Range, NM, and purposely exposed the net- work to the communications challenges posed by the installation’s high moun- tains and vast, rugged desert terrain during the Army’s first Network Integra- tion Evaluation (NIE). We leveraged one brigade combat team, the 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division (2/1 AD), with more than 3,800 Soldiers divided into various formations and a diverse set of vehicles and equipment. Most important, we brought together six programs of record with 29 developmental and emerging capabilities in an integrated environment, so that each component could be evaluated as part of the larger, overarching network.


This unprecedented approach is a major leap forward in maturing the Army’s net- work. The network is the Army’s No. 1 modernization priority; to meet that chal- lenge, we must transform our traditional acquisition process. Rapid technological progress means we cannot afford to view networked systems as individual devices with their own distinct requirements and acquisition timelines. Instead, we must integrate and deploy networked capabili- ties as they become mature and are proven operationally relevant to the Soldier.


Senior leaders describe the new approach as “buy less, more often.” For the program


WIN-T INCREMENT 2


Two Point of Presence vehicles provide communications capability in the six-week WIN-T Increment 2 Production Qualification Test-Government (PQT-G) at Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. While WIN-T Increment 2 does not undergo formal operational testing until spring 2012, more than a dozen sets of the equipment have been installed on vehicles for use in NIE 12.1 in October and November. The PQT-G, which concluded in August, was based on an operational mission set that is fundamentally built around the unit structure of 2/1 AD. (U.S. Army photo.)


IMPROVING APPS


PFC Nicholas Johnson, a Soldier with the 2/1 AD who developed a medical evacuation application for smartphones as part of the Connecting Soldiers to Digital Applications initiative, demonstrates software for another application called Ringtail. (U.S. Army photo.)


executive offices (PEOs), it means an entirely new way of interacting with the test, doctrine, and user communities—essen- tially a new way of doing business. Uniting these communities at White Sands twice a year will synchronize and streamline the evaluation and feedback process. Already, it has provided valuable user feedback on a number of major systems involved in the first NIE, including the Joint Tacti- cal Radio System (JTRS) Ground Mobile Radio (GMR) and Handheld, Manpack, Small-Form Fit (HMS) Rifleman and Manpack radios, as well as the Joint Capa- bilities Release (JCR) of Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2)/ Blue Force Tracking (BFT).


For these program-of-record capabilities and the larger number of developmental and emerging systems, we received the


kind of frank input you get only from direct engagement with Soldiers who need these products to fulfill their mis- sions. Rapidly incorporating their candid feedback will allow the Army to avoid potentially costly system changes in later stages of development.


NETWORK BASELINE The June-July NIE also notched prog- ress toward establishing an Objective Integrated Network Baseline. As we encountered integration challenges between military and commercial equip- ment, or in bringing select hardware and software into the network for the first time, engineers were able to troubleshoot these issues on the ground at White Sands and nearby Fort Bliss, TX. While this sometimes proved difficult because of the complexity of the network and the sheer


AS C.ARMY.MI L


9


ACQUISITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140