search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MISSION COMMAND


COMBINE AND COMMAND


Soldiers collaborate inside the brigade-level Tactical Operations Center for the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division, a nerve center for the Army’s Network Integration Evaluation conducted in June and July. In the foreground, a Soldier uses CPOF, which combines feeds from different mission command systems to provide a broad spectrum of information that commanders can use to collaborate. (Photo by Claire Schwerin, PEO C3T.)


required to change fielded software has been problematic, and the challenge is amplified when faced with a quickly evolving enemy that uses any technology at its disposal.


This article explores how systems can be designed and deployed so that they may adapt rapidly to changing situations in order to meet evolving Soldier needs. It discusses how software can be made to adapt to unanticipated uses through modifications by personnel in theater, as well as how current software development and distribution cycles are being improved to be more responsive to emergent needs. Finally, it shows how pioneering technol- ogy can make some warfighting functions automated and others more intuitive, al- lowing the commander to remain focused on fighting the enemy rather than fight- ing his or her own systems.


24 Army AL&T Magazine


AGILE AND ADVANCED These goals can be accomplished through a combination of agile processes and advanced technology. From a process perspective, Project Manager Mission Command (PM MC), which was rechar- tered from PM Battle Command in July, has led the Army with innovative meth- odologies. These include “scrum sessions” that bring together users from the field to work directly with software developers, eliminating several layers of middlemen to implement valuable feedback.


As these capabilities become mature, PM MC, part of Program Execu- tive Office Command, Control and Communications-Tactical (PEO C3T), also ensures that they are fielded in a timely manner through a quarterly release process. This schedule, which took the place of less frequent software upgrades,


provides a reliable framework for quickly deploying new capabilities and mainte- nance. More important, it ensures that MC software is constantly updated and is operationally relevant to the Soldier with every release.


Such agile techniques and rapid incor- poration of Soldier feedback reflect the goals of the Army network strategy, as demonstrated in the Network Integra- tion Evaluation events. They also support the Mission Command Collapse Strategy, which is “collapsing” separate capabilities such as fires, maneuver, sustainment, air- space management, and air defense into a fully interoperable product line.


In addition, the collapse strategy is cre- ating two core software architecture frameworks from which future applica- tions can be built. These frameworks are


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140