search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
a cohesive information operations (IO) capability—especially electronic warfare and computer network operations—is re- quired to test against new threats and to ensure that the Army’s tactical systems are resilient and survivable against adversaries with developing IO capabilities.


A PROTECTING ESCORT TEAMS


To help achieve these capabilities, the U.S. Army Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training, and Instrumenta- tion (PEO STRI) provided key support to the Army’s first Network Integration Evaluation (NIE) this summer through its Project Manager Instrumentation, Targets, and Threat Simulators (PM ITTS) office.


With the NIE’s focus on an integrated network, the U.S. Army Test and Evalu- ation Command (ATEC) implemented a test plan calling for a robust and viable threat force and technically advanced instrumentation equipment. To satisfy the NIE’s threat needs, PM ITTS established and fielded a robust electronic warfare and computer network operations environment, deploying threat systems and personnel to White Sands Missile Range, NM, to pro- vide threat signal intelligence, direction finding, and jamming representation con- sisting of signal analysis systems, a Threat Computer Network Operations Team (TCNOT) under the purview of 1st Infor- mation Operations Command (1st IOC), and a suite of six threat jammer assets.


“Our support to NIE represents the largest deployment of threat equipment to a sin- gle event in over a decade and is a direct result of several years of successful acquisi- tions and planning to stay synchronized with Army needs,” said Brian Hill, Act- ing Director of PM ITTS’ Threat Systems Management Office (TSMO).


SPC Harold Davis, a Computer Detection Systems Repairer with the 749th Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, 4th Sustainment Brigade, 103rd Sustainment Command (Expeditionary), upgrades a Counter Remote Control Improvised Explosive Device Electronic Warfare system at Contingency Operating Base Adder, Iraq. Specialists such as Davis work to keep convoy escort teams safe from remote-controlled improvised explosive devices in Iraq and Afghanistan. These devices were tested against new threats during the NIE. (U.S. Army photo courtesy of 4th Sustainment Brigade.)


s the Army’s tactical network has evolved into a system- of-systems architecture with advanced cyber technologies,


INTEGRATED THREAT FORCE Because PM ITTS’ support to NIE is expected to increase with follow-on NIE events, PM ITTS is developing solutions that will enable the fielding of the Army’s first Integrated Threat Force (ITF).


The ITF is designed as a test and evalua- tion solution to augment threat mission control, situational awareness, threat fidelity, and reporting of threat force portrayal. The ITF accomplishes this by seamlessly integrating individual threat- faithful systems into one cohesive threat force capable of providing the following capabilities: mission control, communica- tions, situational awareness visualization, and collaboration.


ITF is designed to support various test sizes and constructs using the following threat systems:


• Networked Electronic Support Threat Sensors, a suite of electronic surveil- lance capabilities that includes direction finding, signal collection, and signal exploitation. The system provides ITF


the ability to detect, locate, and identify Blue Force emitters.


• Threat Signals Injection Jammer (TSIJ), an electronic attack system that allows tactical radios to be jammed and evaluated without conducting disruptive open-air electronic warfare testing. The program develops and procures state-of- the-art threat signal injection jammers with remote control capability. The TSIJ program consists of two components: the Control Signal Transmitter (CST) and Remote Jamming Unit (RJU). The CST controls the amplitude of the injected waveform, as well as the selec- tion of the jamming waveform. The RJU is a jamming component that is connected directly to the system under test. It can perform jamming on com- munication and GPS signals.


• Network Exploitation Test Tool (NETT), a comprehensive computer network operations capability that delivers an integrated suite of open- source exploitation tools. It is designed to enable information warfare profes- sionals to conduct live penetration and distribution tests on friendly


AS C.ARMY.MI L


19


ACQUISITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140