search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ALTERNATIVE ACQUISITION


“Fast-paced innovation requires a focus on training and culture, better supported by organizational budgets and not program budgets.”


in acquisition, starting with requirements, the program objective memorandum, and much more. Indeed, dropping the program focus would very dramatically change the face of acquisition as we know it.


Too often, Eaglen observed at that AUSA forum, the services spend years developing new operating concepts and then going to industry to look for technology to support their ideas, rather than looking at exist- ing technology and developing operational concepts around that. She cited as exem- plary the development of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS), with the Army using middle-tier acquisition and working directly with the contrac- tor—with Soldiers and coders working side by side.


“What innovation means and what it can do is often misunderstood,” Eaglen said. “Uber … there were already driv- ers and there were already cars and there were already taxis, they just had to get the technology to totally upend a traditional system.”


With most traditional prime contractors structured around the incentives created by PPBE, it is unlikely that they will eagerly support its demise. But Lofgren isn’t advocating for its wholesale ouster. Instead, he's arguing, that “any change should move deliberately.” One of the first steps to increasing budget flexibility, he


said in a November email exchange, "is to improve program reporting and analy- sis so that the department can build trust with its stakeholders.”


Lofgren is not alone. Both armed services committees,


in their versions of the


National Defense Authorization Act for the 2022 fiscal year, have earmarked fund- ing for a commission to study the PPBE system, Lofgren said.


CONCLUSION In the end, optimism about Army acqui- sition comes from the Army's own determination to do a better job of solv- ing difficult problems. It stood up Army Futures Command, the biggest change in Army structure since the 1970s. It argued for Congress to push OSD to delegate decision-making downward to the lowest level practical. With the new authorities in contracting that Congress has given DOD, the revision of the 5000 series by OUSD (A&S) and creation of a concretely tailored middle tier of acquisition—all of this has converged to create a sense of strong forward motion.


For those accustomed to the Army forever talking about innovating but still flying helicopters and driving tanks designed in a different century, it may seem surprising that there is real innovation going on. Te Army's xTechSearch program, developed by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of


the Army for Acquisition, Logistics and Technology, is actively helping nontradi- tional contractors work with the Army. Trough that program, and with the help of creative thinking, the Army has uncov- ered some highly useful technologies. It's a savvy way to find innovation, but it remains at the small scale.


The next few years will begin to see either the fielding of the Army’s priority programs or their cancellation. No one expects everything to go perfectly. But nonetheless, expectations are high.


For more information on how defense acqui- sition works, go to https://tinyurl.com/ km4kpt2s.


STEVE STARK is senior editor of Army AL&T magazine. He holds an M.A. in creative writing from Hollins University and a B.A. in English from George Mason University. In addition to more than two decades of editing and writing about the military, science and technology, he is, as Stephen Stark, the best-selling ghostwriter of several consumer health-oriented books and an award-winning novelist.


https://asc.ar my.mil


15


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92