search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
There are a significant number of areas where the Department of Defense is no longer technologically ahead. The most obvious fix for this is not necessarily changing the rules, but looking at where the budget’s going.


has competition at least in all critical areas or next-generation critical areas? Tat’s the kind of thing that we try to research in our research center here [at the University of Maryland]. So the sec- ond question, who do you buy it from, is [related to], “What do you want for your industrial base?”


And then the third question is, really, “Who does the buying?” And there’s one of


the biggest problems we have right


now—the experience of the acquisition workforce. You really want your senior people, experienced people, knowledge- able people to be making those decisions. But unfortunately, we have had an aging workforce, and they were replaced by “interns.” In fact, today 55 percent of the DOD’s acquisition workforce have less than five years of experience, with few mentors remaining to help them.


Army AL&T: Do you think that the Better Buying Power (BBP) initiative of building the professionalism of the work- force is really making a difference, or is it too early to tell?


Gansler: Well, it’s an important initia- tive—let’s start it that way.


In order to try to address this need, here in my research center, we’re running a program on acquisition specialization for graduate students—case studies and things like that, which we’re teaching and


getting certified. But even the Defense Acquisition University is somewhat resis- tant to the needed change in the sense that they don’t teach the best practices of the commercial world, and there are many areas where commercial best practices truly are the best. Tey teach, “Here’s how we do it,” the 186,000 pages of the Code of Federal Regulations. And they teach buying goods and not buying services.


Te BBP professionalism initiative is something we should be doing, because there aren’t mentors out there nowadays. One thing we might want to think about is creating an organization that has some experienced people who can help as coun- selors or mentors for the contracting and acquisition practices. I think that’s a step we need to take. Te world changes. Why are we teaching the way we used to do it, instead of recognizing that technology’s changed, the scenarios have changed, the threat has changed?


We didn’t have to worry about cybersecu- rity 15 years ago. And the sort of things that you could have—automation and other


techniques, robotics, things like


that—we want to make sure we’re taking full advantage of from the commercial world or even the global world, and not just constraining ourselves to the way we used to do it.


Army AL&T: Who would be the best entity to take up that responsibility for


providing experienced counsel, then? Would it be academia?


Gansler: Well, that would be in the right direction. And you also need to make sure you’ve got some of the creative and senior experienced government and industry people doing it, because the old way isn’t giving much authority to the program manager. Te contracting people now tell them what to do, and you’d like to have the program manager experienced as well as the contracting people. You’d like to have the program manager be able to have some flexibility to make some choices instead of having the old laws and rules dictate the way we do it.


Army AL&T: You’ve said, to quote the Gansler Commission report, that contracting people are “understaffed, overworked, undertrained, under- supported and, I would argue, most importantly, undervalued.” Given all that government civilian employees have been through over the last year with furloughs and sequestration, why would someone want a government job?


Gansler: Especially with what it pays, you mean, besides that.


Army AL&T: Besides that.


Gansler: My son [Douglas F. Gansler] was attorney general of Maryland [from 2006 to 2014], and he’s just gone to work for a law firm and his salary has skyrock- eted. I was impressed with that. It makes the point you’re making. I think what you need now is for [Secretary of Defense Dr.] Ash Carter to sort of take the lead in emphasizing the importance of an acqui- sition workforce career path, and they will be listened to.


Army AL&T: It seems as though govern- ment employees are often maligned as


ASC.ARMY.MIL 117


CRITICAL THINKING


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172