search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
POWER OF DETERMINATION


A Soldier assigned to the 498th Transportation Company guides a Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle through a motor pool at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, Aug. 6, 2014, as part of participation in convoy escort team training. DOD’s rapid development and procurement of MRAPs, initiated in 2007 by then-Defense Secretary Dr. Robert Gates, illustrates the power that a determined senior leader can have in changing acquisition processes. (Photo by SFC Luis Saavedra, 10th Sustainment Brigade Public Affairs Office)


to meet them; and making decisions about acquisition policy based on evidence, not opinion. In our November 2014 NDIA report, “Pathway to Transformation”, we detail specific propos- als in each area, which I encourage the readers of this magazine to review. To view the report, go to: http://www.ndia.org/ Advocacy/AcquisitionReformInitiative/Documents/NDIA %20Pathway%20to%20Transformation%20Acquisition %20Report.pdf


Tose proposals are options to get the process started; they are by no means the only options, nor will they fix everything that is wrong with the system. No single set of proposals will. What we need is durable, sustained effort—we need our senior leaders to keep their attention focused, learn what is causing problems and cost in the acquisition system and then fix those issues over time. Sustained effort is our only hope to resist the power of boundary conditions on the acquisition process. Single-shot law or policy will not do the trick. It has not before, and it will not this time.


Te overwhelming majority of the people working in the acqui- sition system—in DOD, industry and in Congress—respond in good faith to the pressures they face and the prerogatives at their


disposal. If we want to revamp acquisition, we need to introduce new pressures and prerogatives more powerful than those cre- ating the system’s present equilibrium. Te last decade of war demonstrated that an evident need and sustained leadership can do the trick. We have both today, and now is the time to act.


MR. WILL GOODMAN is the assistant vice president for policy at NDIA, the defense industry’s oldest and largest association. Before joining NDIA, Goodman worked as senior defense adviser to Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-VT, the Senate’s most senior defense appropriator, and before that as an assistant for plans in the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy. Goodman has an M.A. in security studies from Georgetown University and a B.A. in English from the University of Florida.


If you’re a defense industry professional and would like to provide insight from your perspective, send an email to armyalt@gmail. com and describe the Industry Insight commentary you’d like to write. Army AL&T editors will provide further direction.


ASC.ARMY.MIL


143


COMMENTARY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172