search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
LIFESAVING POSSIBILITIES


WEB DEMO


LTC Felicia D. Langel, director of USAMRMC’s SPO, reviews the NPI website with the website administrator Amanda Cecil, center, and team member Jean M. Shinbur. The NPI site allows SMEs at the USAMRMC to access innovative ideas submitted by vendors and evaluate their applicability to its mission. Vendors, in turn, can submit their products using a two-step, password-protected process. (Photo by Heather McDowell Duong, USAMRMC Public Affairs)


applicability to the mission. Participating businesses receive feed- back on USAMRMC’s interest in their submissions, usually in 60 days or less.


Te USAMRMC’s contracting element, the U.S. Army Medi- cal Research Acquisition Activity, launched NPI in December 2006. Te objective was to provide a starting point for indi- viduals who wished to present ideas or products but weren’t sure how to “crack the code” and formally collaborate with DOD. At the same time, technical experts were feeling inundated with requests for meetings with vendors to discuss products and were looking for a way to learn about new technologies in a fair and equitable way.


Because the site was geared toward fostering promising ideas and basic research rather than serving as a contracting tool, the USAMRMC’s Strategic Partnerships Office (SPO) assumed its management in 2011. NPI has helped introduce new medical tools that are now in use in the field, and the staff is continu- ing to make administrative and technical improvements to


82 Army AL&T Magazine April–June 2015


eliminate redundancies, streamline the review process and make the system more user-friendly.


GREASING THE SKIDS Successful operation of the NPI website involves close coordi- nation between vendors and product evaluators. A technically diverse cadre of approximately 30 SMEs reviews submissions. Tey include command personnel such as project managers, nurse consultants, program analysts and biomedical engineers, who assume this role in addition to their day-to-day responsibilities.


Reviewers provide formal feedback, referred to as dispositions, on each submission. In their dispositions, they provide insight and detail into whether a product meets their needs and, if not, why. If a product could prove useful with modifications, they provide that input. Ten they direct vendors to the resources they should explore to apply for funding to further explore the idea or develop the product, such as through a broad agency announcement, program announcement or solicitation.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172