search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE OVERSIZED POWER OF SMALL DATA


are in similar places on both plots, meaning that the estimated values are similar from both the good and bad experiments.


Values within the ranges of the bars are those that are reasonably believable based on the data. These ranges represent the uncertainty in our conclusions regarding how far Bert and Ernie push the box on average. Notice there is much more uncertainty in the plot on the right from the poorly designed experiment. Using the plot from the well-designed experiment on the left, we can conclude with little risk that Ernie is pushing harder than Bert.


This increase in uncertainty is a result of the ways the tests were planned. The increase is moderate compared to what can easily occur. Because of the increased uncertainty, there will be more risk involved for any decision that depends on under- standing how hard each of them pushes.


In the sensor example, the way the test was modi- fied caused uncertainty to increase so much that we could not form any meaningful conclusions about how the error or several of the other test variables affected the ability of the vehicle to avoid the sensor.


Changing the sensor test appears to have been unwarranted, and the way it was changed increased the uncertainty in our conclusions to the extent that they were not useful.


—JASON MARTIN


analyze the data, report results and make a decision without ever knowing mistakes were made. Such decisions are built on a house of cards that can be costly in terms of dollars, time or even lives.


A SYSTEMIC SOLUTION Te hole in our small data capabilities also presents a tremendous opportunity. For each of the thousands of small data decisions we make, we can learn to use statistical methods that help ensure that we 1) spend appropriate resources to collect the right amount of data, 2) collect the right data to most fully answer our ques- tions and 3) perform analysis that most accurately quantifies what we believe in a way that communicates the uncertainty in conclusions. Tis will fundamentally change our abilities to most effectively use resources and take calculated risks.


QUESTIONS FOR LEADERSHIP I know from experience that widespread adoption of the statis- tical methods we need is not likely to happen without strong leadership. Decision-makers must encourage it by asking the right questions and insisting that we use rigorous statistical processes to create and analyze data. We need leaders and decision-makers to know which questions to ask and how to recognize an adequate answer.


Here are examples of some important questions and information we should always know. Te answers should be based on rigor- ous statistical methods, not opinions.


• Is that test the right size? Do we need more or fewer test runs? What assumptions were made to determine the size of the test and why? Please show me the (simple) results of calculations that support the plan.


EXPANDING THE CIRCLE


Small data is the basis for many, if not most, acquisition decisions. The Naval Postgraduate School recognizes the importance of data science education for DOD, and it has launched an interdisciplinary Data Science and Analytics Group, which will provide better education, research programs and advisory services to DOD. (Photo by Matthew Schehl, Naval Postgraduate School)


90


Army AL&T Magazine


Summer 2021


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124