search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
From the Army Acquisition Executive Bringing Innovation to the Warfighter Through Army Science


It is with great enthusiasm and vigorous dedication to our Soldiers in combat that I welcome you to this edition of the award-winning Army AL&T Magazine, an issue focused on the vitally important topic of “Bringing Innovation to the Warfighter Through Army Science.” I commend the magazine to our readers, as this topic is indeed close to my heart. For more than a year, I have been emphasizing that the Army needs to continue investing in and developing new tech- nologies that help make the dismounted Soldier a decisive weapon. In order to accomplish this, we must continue to foster an increasingly agile acquisition system and increase our focus on helping the individual Soldier.


The Navy and Air Force enjoy significant technological advantages, compared with potential adversaries. No enemy wants to fly against the Air Force’s F-22, for example. If you’re the pilot of an F-22, the U.S. government wraps about $200 million in stealth, mobility, and weaponry around you. In the Navy, the nuclear attack submarine has become one of the major deterrents to the development by potential adversaries of surface ships and submarines.


The dismounted Soldier and small tactical units on the move should have a commensurate technological “boost” or overmatch capabil- ity. Investing wisely in science and technology—harnessing the best available emerging technologies with the proven capability to help Soldiers in combat—is central to this effort. Once outside of a Ground Combat Vehicle, once outside of the Abrams tank, and once outside of a Black Hawk helicopter, what makes our Soldier different from the enemy hiding behind a rock?


Unfortunately, we are not fighting a buttoned-up or “linear” war; the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan call upon small, dismounted tactical units to find and destroy an enemy who is dispersed, hiding, aware of the tactical situation, and often deliber- ately blended in with the local population. The fighting often takes place on a nonlinear, 360-degree battlefield where Soldiers need to get out of their vehicles and engage in intense combat for the last 100 yards or so to accomplish their objective. This critical distance is where we must focus much of our efforts.


We have to respond continually to the shortfalls and capability gaps that our Soldiers experience in low-intensity conflict. We maintain a decisive edge in all other areas of warfare. We have the best combat attack helicopters in the world, the finest rotary-wing aircraft, and world-class armored vehicles. Still, there is more work to do to make our Soldiers decisive weapons.


The idea is to wrap new technologies around the Soldier: state-of-the- art sensors, weapons, and protective gear. We are making progress. For instance, our forces in Afghanistan are receiving several thousand gunshot detection systems for the individual dismounted Soldier.


The Individual Gunshot Detector, or IGD, consists of several miniature acoustic sensors worn by the individual Soldier and a small display screen attached to body armor that shows the distance and direction of incoming fire. A small processor, about the size of a deck of cards, detects the supersonic sound waves generated by enemy gunfire and instantaneously alerts Soldiers to the location of the hostile target.


The Army plans to strategically disperse the systems throughout small, dismounted units to get maximum protective coverage for platoons, squads, and other units on the move.


In the future, the Army plans to integrate this technology with its Land Warrior and Nett Warrior systems, which provide networked situational awareness for dismounted units. The systems employ a helmet-mounted display screen that uses GPS digital-mapping-display technology.


We are also making great strides in assisting the dismounted Soldier with intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities from unmanned aircraft systems (UAS); small units on the move in rigorous terrain can now launch small, hand-held UAS such as the Raven, able to beam back images and video of the surrounding battlefield in real time to small, portable computer screens.


Another game-changing development in Soldier technologies is the new airburst XM25 grenade launcher, which can detonate rounds above or near an enemy in defilade. The XM25, prototypes of which have been fielded in Afghanistan, helps our Soldiers succeed against enemy fighters who are firing on our forces from behind a rock, tree, or ditch.


There are many other signs of progress in Soldier technologies. We are deploying the XM2010 sniper rifle with an increased range, field- ing a wide array of uniforms with fire-resistant materials, deploying lighter-weight body armor, preparing to field a new Enhanced Com- bat Helmet, and launching a competition to build a new Improved Carbine while simultaneously upgrading the existing M4.


We are also working vigorously to “network” the dismounted Sol- dier for instantaneous, real-time access to combat-relevant voice, video, data, and images across the battlefield. We have a series of network evaluations and exercises planned at Fort Bliss, TX, and White Sands Missile Range, NM, which will place cutting-edge technologies in the hands of Soldiers to determine which IT and net- working capabilities are best suited for our forces.


None of these efforts would be possible without the contributions of the top-notch Army acquisition, logistics, and technology community—the Materiel Enterprise—and my extremely talented and dedicated team members, to include GEN Ann Dunwoody, Commanding General, U.S. Army Materiel Command, and her staff; my Principal Deputy, Ms. Heidi Shyu, former chair of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board; and my Principal Military Deputy, LTG Bill Phillips, former Commanding General, Joint Contracting Com- mand, Iraq-Afghanistan. Our science and technology efforts, in particular, have been immeasurably enhanced by the arrival of Dr. Marilyn Freeman as our Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Research and Technology and Dr. Scott Fish, the Army’s first Chief Scientist in more than two decades.


I thank you for your interest in these pressing issues as we advance together into the future with moral courage, dedication to our warfighters, and an abiding commitment to leveraging the best of what S&T has to offer our Army and our Soldiers.


Dr. Malcolm Ross O’Neill Army Acquisition Executive

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88