search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T C O N F E R E N C E C A L L


To counter the growing threat of improvised explosive devices, DOD and the Army employed multiple contractors simultaneously to rapidly produce and deploy thousands of MRAP vehicles within a short, 2-year time span. (U.S. Army photo by SGT Mark B. Matthews.)


Army Acquisition Evolves During Overseas Contingency Operations Kris Osborn


he U.S. Army acquisition community can best serve Soldiers at war by seeking at times to properly blend traditional acquisition practices with rapid and so-called hybrid approaches, said MG R. Mark Brown, Deputy for Acquisition and Systems Management in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology (ASAALT).


T


“We have to remain flexible. We have to be responsive to the warfighter’s theater needs,” Brown said, speaking to an audience of military and industry Jan. 14, 2011, at the Association of the United States Army (AUSA) Institute of Land Warfare’s Aviation Symposium and Exhibition, National Harbor, MD.


Flexibility includes innovation to adjust to enemy techniques and tactics.


52 APRIL –JUNE 2011


The current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have required the Army to adapt its acquisition practices to be more efficient and more nimble in cer- tain critical situations. The Army can accelerate, adjust, and, in some cases, bypass traditional acquisition processes in order to meet urgent operational needs. For example, DOD and the Army moved to rapidly produce and deploy thousands of Mine Resistant


Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles needed to counter the growing threat of improvised explosive devices.


This critical flexibility requires weighing traditional, DOD 5000 series acquisition procedures against more rapid approaches that promise speedier delivery of needed wartime gear and technologies. The Army has learned to perform this delicate balancing act and


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88