search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


“This is a monumental undertaking, and it requires a new level of integra- tion and synchronization,” said COL John Wendel, Project Manager Infantry Brigade Combat Team, part of Program Executive Office (PEO) Integration. “The purpose is to seek efficiencies and synergies. The idea of combining events forces integration, so what we will do is synchronize the technologies into a singular network brigade formation.”


The first four weeks of the exercise, slated for this June with the 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division at Fort Bliss, TX, adjacent to White Sands, will include the concurrent LUTs.


“If you combine the events, you are going to get better answers that cut across programs, systems, and agencies. It will also make us more agile going forward,” Wendel said.


An Integrated Network The last two weeks of the INBE will include an exercise aimed at synchro- nizing the systems into an integrated combat network. The idea is to facili- tate a series of annual evaluations that will serve to expedite the developmental process and better inform the Army’s tactical network acquisition decisions.


“By beginning to conduct exercises that look at an integrated network, the Army intends to lessen the in-field integration burden on our operational units by providing relevant operational environments in which to evaluate new technologies and capabilities that make up capability packages and sets, prior to fielding the new systems to operational units. This will ensure that the important integration work is done upfront,” said Paul Mehney, PEO Integration spokesman.


Having the Army incrementally develop network technologies best suited to serve Soldiers in combat is designed to combine Army Programs of Record with commercial-off-the-shelf solutions


26 APRIL –JUNE 2011


If you combine the events, you are going to get better answers that cut across programs, systems, and agencies. It will also make us more agile going forward.


from industry. The desired result is an affordable, technologically mature tactical network that can move combat- relevant information across the force in real time, using high-bandwidth wave- forms such as Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) and Wideband Networking Waveform (WNW), Wendel said.


“In the past, we have spent years build- ing requirements and products. Now we will conduct these evaluations every year, testing technologies from indus- try and Programs of Record to gain some economies of scale and make smarter acquisition decisions on a more frequent basis. The important part is


transitioning these objective waveforms to Programs of Record,” Wendel added.


The systems undergoing LUTs are:


• Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Ground Mobile Radio, a multi-channel, vehicle-mounted, software-programmable radio able to transmit voice, video, data, and images using high-bandwidth wave- forms such as SRW and WNW.


• JTRS Hand-held Manpack Small Form Fit, a multi-channel, Soldier- mounted, software-programmable radio with the same transmission capabilities as the Ground Mobile Radio.


A Tactical Communications Node vehicle (right) and a generator were among the assets used in the WIN-T Increment 2 Limited User Test at Fort Stewart, GA, in March 2009. (U.S. Army photo by Jason Bock, PEO C3T.)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88