search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BBP 3.0 101


technological superiority is not assured, and in fact it is being challenged very effectively right now.”


Kendall aims to change that with a stra- tegic research and development (R&D) investment effort modeled on a similar 1970s effort that teamed government with industry. Tat effort “will be designed to set out the next few years of high-priority R&D to get us into position where we’ll have technologies we can take into game- changing systems.” He noted that the 1970s effort yielded many of the systems in use today: “things like smart weapons, smart-seekers, some of our networking technologies and other things that have allowed us to dominate on the battlefield for quite a long time now.”


“Te idea is to get to the next generation of those things,” Kendall said. “If we don’t do that, the concern I have about tech- nological superiority is going to become even greater.”


INCENTIVIZE PRODUCTIVITY Another core concept of BBP 3.0, Kendall said, is aligning profitability with DOD goals. “We do a reasonably good job of aligning industry’s opportunity to make a profit with the results that we expect. One thing we can do better is provide incentives to innovation” in addition to incentives for cost and schedule perfor- mance, he noted.


With respect to cost-plus or fixed-price contracts, Kendall said, “Tere is a stron- ger correlation in using the incentives in our results than there is to whether it’s a cost-plus or fixed-price contract. We’re going to continue to emphasize that.”


His office will also emphasize the expan- sion of the Superior Supplier Incentive Program across DOD, Kendall said. “Te idea here is to let industry know how it’s doing relative to its competitors and its peers in the industrial base.” Tis will be done at the service level, he said, not the DOD level, because many business units are aligned to particular services.


Another piece of BBP 2.0 that will carry over to 3.0 is increasing the use of perfor- mance-based logistics (PBL). “We’re not improving our performance in this area as much as I’d like to see,” said Kendall, although there have been improvements despite the “difficult year we had in [FY]13. Between sequestration and fur- loughs and everything else, the workload on our contracting people in particular was pretty excessive.” PBL is “a harder way to do contracting,” Kendall acknowl- edged, “but it gets results.”


A new element in BBP 3.0 is an effort to remove barriers to using commercial tech- nology. “Tis is one of the items in 3.0 where we’re going to put a team together, we’re going to work with industry and


we’re going to do specific things to imple- ment this broad goal. Technology—of course—in a number of commercial areas moves more quickly than in military areas. We want to take advantage of that. We want to find a way to bring innovators who are in the commercial world—give them a reason to be involved with the government and do business with the government.”


Te government’s awareness of industry’s internal R&D (IRAD) has improved, Kendall said. “We want to go a step further with this and start looking at what we’re actually getting out of both of these pots of money.” Te money for IRAD is about $4 billion to $4.5 billion a year, whereas contracted R&D is close to $10 billion a year. “Tat’s a significant amount of money,” he noted. “Our total R&D budget right now is running about $60 billion.”


INCENTIVIZE INNOVATION Increasing the use of prototyping and experimentation can help advance the state of the art, particularly when bud- gets are tight. Building prototypes and experimenting with them can be a more cost-effective way of developing new capabilities, Kendall said. “For a relatively small amount of money, you advance technology, you advance the state of the art in the direction you want to go by a significant amount. You reduce lead time by several years, perhaps, by having that technology in an actual product. You help your industrial base, you keep your design teams alive.”


“IT’S NOT OUR DUTY TO SPEND MONEY AND GET IT OUT THE DOOR; IT’S OUR DUTY TO CONTROL OUR COSTS AND SAVE MONEY WHEREVER WE CAN TO GET MORE VALUE FOR THE TAXPAYER.”


Te problem, he said, “is finding the money to do it. I’m going to be propos- ing some of these in the budget process this fall [2014], and we’ll see how it goes.” Kendall added that if money does go to proto typing and experimentation, that probably will mean sacrificing “something we won’t do … and that’s going to be the


122 Army AL&T Magazine January–March 2015


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184