search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THINK READY, BE READY


FIGURE 2 1


Leverage proven RFI fielding operations to supply deploying Soldiers.


2


Using Army prepositioned stocks, approve an Armywide requirement to store sets of FR uniforms as contingency stocks.


3


Consider changing the Soldier’s initial issue and subsequent clothing bag authorization from non-FR uniforms to FR uniforms.


THREE WAYS TO GO


The author says the Army has three options for buying time for the industrial base to ramp up production of flame-resistant uniforms to meet requirements for a possible 0leaving Soldiers unprepared for combat is unacceptable. (Graphic by USAASC)


Tat would take the Army to a lower state of readiness and force protection. However, that is exactly what could happen this year if the Army does nothing to anticipate the surge requirement for flame-resistant uniforms for Soldiers deploying in support of a major conflict.


ACTION NOW = READINESS LATER Are there better acquisition approaches for the Army to consider? Yes, and now is the time to act—before there is an actual need for hundreds of thousands of deploying Soldiers. Current RFI oper- ations efficiently support deploying Soldiers with flame-resistant uniforms. At the same time, current central issue facilities and military clothing and sales stores across Army installations sup- port Soldiers with non-flame-resistant uniforms. Tis period of sustained excellence is the time to plan and prepare the industrial base to support a surge requirement for flame-resistant uniforms. Each of the following three options has advantages and disad- vantages, but with overall benefits far exceeding the costs of the unacceptable status quo. Te Army must be able to buy time for the industrial base to ramp up production and meet surge requirements for flame-resistant uniforms. (See Figure 2.)


Option 1—Leverage the efficiency and excellence of current Rapid Fielding Initiative operations. Over the last decade, RFI has successfully fielded millions of items to deploying Soldiers. Te current operation can simultaneously support the fielding of flame-resistant uniforms and combat gear for up to three brigade combat teams per month. Te RFI could seamlessly absorb a mission supporting 15 BCTs’ worth of uni- forms by simply adding that much buffer-stock inventory of flame-resistant uniforms to the central warehouse in Lansing, Michigan. Te storage, distribution, transportation and fielding operations for these uniforms would operate similarly to current RFI operations.


Te barrier to implementation is not affordability but a change- resistant Army culture. Current RFI operations are 100 percent OCO-funded, and this option would require the Army to acknowledge the long-term benefit of RFI operations and make the RFI an enduring requirement with a commitment to fund at least part of the program’s operations from the base bud- get—essentially institutionalizing that portion of the RFI. As a possible model, the Army successfully institutionalized the


110


Army AL&T Magazine


October-December 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156