search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
READINESS: MORE THAN A CONCEPT


FIGURE 1 IPS Elements Life Cycle Sustainment Management


• Product support management. • Supply support.


• Packaging, handling, storage and transportation.


• Maintenance planning and management.


Technical Management


• Design interface. • Sustaining engineering. • Technical data. • Computer resources.


Infrastructure Management


• Facilities and infrastructure. • Manpower and personnel. • Support equipment. • Training and training support.


U.S. Army, comprising National Guard and Reserve units in about 15 Western states.


Acquisition’s piece of the readiness pic- ture is primarily equipment, Dillard said: “Do I have the vehicles, weapons and other things on hand versus autho- rized, and are they in a state of ability to be used? Acquisition certainly affects the training piece, training devices and other things, but largely it’s the equip- ment piece, more so than the personnel piece. It’s the design of our systems, which is really important for reliability and availability and maintainability so that the equipment portion of the readi- ness rating is as high as it can be and stays that way.”


THE REQUIREMENTS FACTOR Designing systems involves the require- ments community, too, of course. But the acquisition community can influence the shape and scope of requirements to a sig- nificant extent, said Dillard and Jones. In the case of an armored vehicle, for exam- ple, “the number of hours, the number of track paths, the number of gallons of gasoline burned—those kinds of things can be variable,” Dillard said.


BETTER INPUT MEANS BETTER OUTCOME


The acquisition process often slows down when there’s not enough collaboration between the materiel developer and the combat developer to understand the impacts of specific features on a system or item that Soldiers are asking for. These integrated product support (IPS) elements provide a good framework to consider various important factors. (SOURCE: Defense Acquisition University)


“Te need is what it is. Te materiel devel- oper doesn’t get a vote when it comes to the need,” Jones said. “Where we do get a vote is how the need is developed. We’ve got to go all the way back to the beginning of the process” to best support readiness.


editors discussed readiness with Dillard and Jones in a July 11 phone interview.


Dillard referred to “Army Regulation [AR] 220-1, Army Unit Status Reporting and Force Registration – Consolidated Policies,” which establishes the Defense


14


Readiness Reporting System – Army, among other things, to break readiness down into three major components: per- sonnel, equipment and training. In the course of his 26-year Army career, he grew familiar with AR 220-1 as head of the readiness reporting branch of the 6th


Program managers (PMs) tend to focus on awarding the right contracts and com- plying with acquisition regulations, Jones noted. “We don’t spend a lot of time say- ing to ourselves, ‘If you had just changed that design, or if we had done it this way, we wouldn’t have had to add one more hour of training on the back end,’ and


Army AL&T Magazine


October-December 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156