search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
A NEW ‘FACE’ FOR AVIATION ACQUISITION


customers, including government pro- gram managers, with assurance that the software is, in fact, reusable and portable in a FACE environment.


Adopting an open architecture based on a common set of standards promotes devel- opment of capabilities that can be reused across multiple platforms. Tis eliminates or greatly lessens design and development efforts and reduces integration timeline costs. It is also more efficient. If a base- line profile of the specific requirements of these common capabilities is created by analyzing the platform systems and subsystems, then specific software prod- ucts can be developed to target these common capabilities. Figure 2 illus- trates how some of these capabilities (situational


awareness, navigation and


communications) developed to meet the requirements of one or more of the FACE operating system segments can be reused across multiple aircraft platforms.


FIGURE 2


WHY THE CONSORTIUM APPROACH WORKS Adopting a standards-based open archi- tecture like the FACE approach can reduce nonrecurring engineering costs— those things that are paid for once during product development. Under the cur- rent acquisition process, each platform develops separate systems independently despite having the same requirement. Tat means each pays separately to develop an individual solution at a cost similar to the other platforms. Devel- oping one standard solution to employ across all platforms saves money by elim- inating the cost of producing separate, redundant systems. Figure 3 illustrates the reduction in cost that occurs when a software solution is developed once and used across all platforms. Tis sav- ings could be applied to other unfunded requirements, thus contributing to an overall increase in warfighter capability that otherwise would not occur.


A real-life example that illustrates the principles


behind that


the FACE Consor-


tium’s approach is the Federal Aviation Administration’s requirement


all


aircraft, including military and civilian, have Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) technology. Tis new positioning surveillance technology is more advanced, using satellites to identify the position of an aircraft instead of the older radar-based tracking system.


ADS-B is composed of two parts: the ADS-B out, which broadcasts aircraft position-related information,


and the


ADS-B in, which receives information from ground control and other aircraft. Te position of an aircraft is identified by satellites, then the information is broad- cast to ground control and other aircraft via the ADS-B out. Information is then received by the ADS-B in.


Suppose platforms A and B are legacy systems and need to be fitted with an ADS-B out. Platform A has agreed to pay supplier A to develop and install an ADS-B out. Supplier A’s ADS-B out is tightly coupled with proprietary hard- ware and software on platform A, so it is more difficult and costly to add to other aircraft. Software that is tightly coupled tends to work in one system and usually requires significant reprogramming to work in another system, thereby reducing the capacity for integration.


USE ACROSS PLATFORMS


Capabilities developed for one FACE operating system segment can be reused across multiple aircraft platforms. (Source: The Open Group)


Platform B has contracted with supplier B for the development and installation of a different ADS-B out. Supplier B has aligned the components of ADS-B out with the FACE technical standard, meaning that key interfaces are used to allow information to be passed between existing software and hardware on the platform and the new ADS-B out. Supplier B’s ADS-B out has also been developed and tested, so the costs to fit it


34


Army AL&T Magazine


October-December 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156