search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Army Acquisition Career Development Assessment will help decision-makers focus human capital planning and investment.


How do we best address and prioritize planning, resources and emerging issues? An established governance structure enables ASA(ALT) to leverage enterprisewide knowledge and resources, reduce redundancies in programs and resources, and optimize human capital support critical to the Army mission. Two key initiatives arising from the HCSP meet the Army’s priority of readiness:


• Te HCSP governance process. • Te Acquisition Career Development Assessment.


GOVERNANCE PROCESS Creating a process to validate, prioritize and integrate human capital programs is vital to sustaining an AAW that can provide our Soldiers with world-class equipment and services, now and in the future. An institutionalized governance process meets one of the HCSP’s strategic goals: to “improve communications and collaboration.” At its core, the process puts into operation how we manage the HCSP and implement the initiatives.


Over the past year, your Army DACM Office has led efforts to create a structure, identify membership and establish a cycle of activities. Te governance structure includes a mix of formal governance bodies and temporary integrated project teams. (See Figure 2, Page 136.) Te Army acquisition executive has over- all oversight for the governance structure, which includes four governing bodies:


• Executive Steering Committee (ESC), comprising senior Army leaders. Te ESC approves the strategic direction, goals and objectives for the HCSP. It ensures accountability and senior leader focus. Te first ESC meeting was in early August.


• HCSP Council: Monitors the goals and objectives and tracks progress and achievement of initiatives.


• AAW Advisory Board: Provides input from the AAW on the goals, objectives and initiatives.


• Integration team: Coordinates efforts across the Army and the Office of the Secretary of Defense, implements initiatives and develops action plans. Te team consists of key stake- holders such as ASA(ALT) leadership and staff, Army DACM Office staff, Army acquisition functional leaders and advis- ers, organizational acquisition career management advocates, command and program executive office representatives, and human capital and Army/command G-1 experts.


Tese governing bodies operate both from the top down and the bottom up. At the strategic level, senior leaders provide guidance as well as review. At the operational level, the HCSP Council, in conjunction with the AAW Advisory Board and goal champions (who advocate for a goal, or for objectives or initiatives within a goal), plan and manage the execution of the human capital strategy.


Last but not least, the integration team focuses on tactical exe- cution to achieve objectives. Te team’s principal function is to manage the change process and identify, integrate, leverage and catalog human capital information. Te collected information is used to improve AAW human capital programs and initiatives, to ensure that strategic planning and decision-making are sup- ported by key information, and to identify the resources needed to accomplish human capital priorities. As the Army’s priorities evolve, this governance structure supports development, coordi- nation, alignment and integration of new initiatives.


CAREER DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT For the first time, the AAW received an assessment of compe- tency importance and skill levels specific to acquisition career fields (ACFs). Te Acquisition Career Development Assess- ment supports the HCSP, specifically responding to the goal to develop and sustain a professional, agile and qualified acquisi- tion workforce. Te assessment was delivered via a web-enabled tool from TrueChoice Solutions Inc., uniquely modeled to cap- ture responses from our AAW regarding:


• Proficiency in and importance of leadership competencies. • Proficiency in and importance of ACF-specific functional and technical competencies.


• Allocation of time spent on work-related tasks (e.g., activities related to leadership, functional and technical competencies, training and administration). • AAW career preferences.


Tank you to the more than 6,000 members of the AAW who took the time to participate in the inaugural assessment. Work- force members in each of the ACFs received a customized assessment, starting with the contracting ACF in March and con- tinuing through the summer with releases for 12 additional ACFs.


Te data collected from the assessment will guide decision- making in the planning and execution of initiatives through the human capital life cycle. Targeting investments in your professional development ensures that our acquisition work- force remains relevant and proficient, with the right skills and


ASC.ARMY.MIL 135


WORKFORCE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156