search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY SIMULATIONS JUST DON'T CUT THE MUSTARD


FIGURE 1


monolithic simulations that simply provide all the required simulation functional- ity or representation, and are slower and more expensive to modify. Tis approach enables executing each distributed simu- lation use case with fewer resources and data streams (for more details see, “A Necessary Paradigm Change to Enable Composable Cloud-based MS Services,” by Andreas Tolk and Saurabh Mittal in the Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simu- lation Conference).


MSAAS FRAMEWORK


Service-oriented simulations are designed to be modular, where individual functions or domains that are modeled in the simulation are built as individual parts that can be changed or mixed in different ways for the particular use case. (Graphic by the authors and USAASC)


necessary to develop and modify simula- tion capabilities more rapidly and with much less post-development integration re-engineering.


EMERGENCE OF M&S AS A SERVICE In 2018, the NATO Science and Tech- nology Organization’s Modelling and Simulation Group introduced the M&S as a service (MSAAS) concept to enable more composable simulation environ- ments that can be deployed and executed on-demand (NATO MSG-136 Report – MSAAS Concept and Reference Archi- tecture Evaluation Report) (see Figure 1). Service oriented simulation is modularly designed, where functions or domains


30


modeled in the simulation are built as individual parts that can be changed or mixed in different ways for the particu- lar use case.


Te MSAAS paradigm supports agile, rapid, tailor-made simulation solutions from a collection of pre-built and validated models and tools into a unified cloud- based simulation environment whenever the need arises.


MSAAS is intended to promote discov- ery, reusability and composability of M&S services by one key aspect, the use of modularized simulations. Tese tools can be easily tailored and composed for a specific use case, rather than relying on


MSAAS offers an opportunity to better leverage new technologies and tools, plus create inherently interoperable capabilities faster through cooperative and coordi- nated research and development efforts. Open-source software development, which avoids the limitations of proprietary solu- tions, enables crowd-sourcing, which is more effective for innovations. Tis opens participation by smaller compa- nies with new ideas. Open-source allows for many more experts and more coopera- tion for more frequent innovations. A good example is the development of the Linux operating system.


MIGRATION FOR ARMY MODERNIZATION To achieve the required agility and cost limitations, migration from the current monolithic simulation paradigm to one of M&S services that support rapid simu- lation development is critical for Army modernization to keep pace. However, Army modernization cannot wait 10 to 15 years—the typical timeframe for building a new simulation environment—while the new MSAAS ecosystem is created from scratch.


Therefore, the proposed alternative approach is to integrate cloud-enabled services with existing simulations through a web-enabled interface to provide new modeling capabilities as they develop (see


Army AL&T Magazine Summer 2022


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122