GAINING GROUND
I
n the last two years, the U.S. Army’s Precision Strike Missile (PRSM) program successfully accomplished numerous flight tests, pushing the next-generation munition to the edge of its range and proving its long-range capability. And
while PRSM has been testing its limits in the sky, the Army has been simultaneously conducting critical, on-the-ground system qualification tests and manufacturing-readiness assessments.
Addressing the Army’s top modernization priority, long-range precision fires, PRSM is the Army's new surface-to-surface missile that replaces and improves upon the Army Tactical Missile System’s capabilities. Te new missile will defeat threat air defense, missile launchers, command-and-control centers, assem- bly and staging areas, and high-payoff targets at all possible depths of the multidomain battlefield. By 2023, the Army will deliver the first lot of PRSM missiles to the warfighter.
To replace the legacy munition, the PRSM program requires the Army to design, build and produce this new technology from the ground up. However, before PRSM can be delivered to the Soldier, the manufacturing facilities must undergo scrupulous reviews to ensure missile assembly and production are ready for operation.
In early March, the U.S. Army Strategic and Operational Rockets and Missiles (STORM) Project Office and Defense Contract Management Agency conducted the final PRSM enhanced-technology maturation-and-risk-reduction manufacturing-readiness assessment at the Lockheed Martin production facility in Camden, Arkansas. Te manufacturing- readiness assessment defines the current level of manufacturing maturity, identifies any shortfalls and associated costs and risks, and provides a basis for management of manufacturing- maturation planning of the program.
GROUND-LEVEL TEAMWORK Tat March system manufacturing-readiness assessment was a culmination of a yearlong team effort between the STORM Project Office and the prime contractor. Te manufacturing- readiness assessment team reviewed objective evidence in support of a Manufacturing-Readiness Level 7, which identifies the capability to produce the PRSM systems, subsystems and components in a production-representative environment.
To achieve that level, the production facility demonstrated how it will operate, not only when assembling prototypes but also during production of the actual fielded tactical missiles. Te team discussed manufacturing planning early, while ensuring the
46 Army AL&T Magazine Summer 2022 TESTING THE LIMITS
The next-generation PRSM launches from the HIMARS during the U.S. Army’s fourth consecutive flight test on May 12, 2021, in a 400-kilometer demonstration at White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), New Mexico. (Photo courtesy of WSMR)
necessary resources will be in place to support future production needs of the program. Some of the manufacturing-readiness areas included technology and industrial base, design, cost and funding, materials, process capability and controls, quality management, workforce, and facilities and manufacturing management.
“Te event proved to be a critical asset to the ongoing success of PRSM production, providing an early opportunity to address manufacturing risks as well as planning appropriate mitiga- tion steps,” said Linda Fechner of the assessment. Fechner is the STORM PRSM production lead engineer who spearheaded the manufacturing-readiness assessment efforts. “Te team was able to define the current level of manufacturing maturity, identify roadblocks and provide a basis for maturing the overall manu- facturing of the PRSM system.”
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122