search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
$


for the purpose of identifying essential function(s) and alternate methods to adequately satisfy those essential func- tions in the most cost-effective manner. The normal result of VE application is a decrease in cost while improving qual- ity, reliability, durability, effectiveness and/or other desirable characteris- tics.” LSS is the synergy of Lean and Six Sigma that results in the elimina- tion of


the seven sources of wastes


(defects, overproduction, transporta- tion, waiting, inventory, motion, and over-processing), using the scientific methodology of Define, Measure, Ana- lyze, Improve, and Control.


BBPi uses the practices and disciplines of VE and LSS, coupled with very specific language, to attack inefficiency across the areas of costing and budgeting, contract- ing, and the Army’s overall approach to program management. It should not be relegated to five categorical focus areas and 23 initiatives, but rather viewed as a broad new approach, giving greater breadth and depth to garnering and real- izing efficiencies.


MEETING THE CHALLENGE


“We’re facing fiscal realities. We’re all sharing the pain,” Shyu said during a town hall meeting Aug. 19, 2011, at Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. As of Feb. 2, through actions directly attrib- utable to BBPi, the Army had achieved acquisition program efficiencies total- ing $11,028,851,029 in savings and $12,681,894,257 in avoidance across Program Objective Memorandum 2012 through 2017, effective Jan. 12.


This represents clear and measurable


progress toward the targeted $487 bil- lion defense deficit. As with all major change, BBPi has ample critics, who provide a healthy dose of


skepticism regarding its effectiveness. Critics aside,


Better buying power and Army efficiencies involve multiple players and multiple methods. (SOURCE: PEO Command, Control, and Communications – Tactical.)


Deputy Assistant


Secretary of the Army (Procurement)


Finding Efficiencies Figure 1 Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition Policy & Logistics) Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Plans, Programs & Resources) Deputy Assistant


Secretary of the Army (Acquisition Systems Management)


Deputy Assistant Army


Materiel Command


Assistant Secretary of the Army


(Financial Management & Comptroller) (validation)


Secretary of the Army (Strategy and Performance Planning)


it


is undeniable


that applying better


buying power principles yields results; is


the impetus for cultural change in


defense acquisition; and has forged a permanent place in the defense acquisi- tion lexicon.


For more information, go to the Defense Acquisition


Portal’s Better Buying


Power Gateway (https://dap.dau.mil/ leadership/Pages/bbp.aspx). The BBPi training modules contain information on the and templates.


initiatives,


exhaustive briefings,


JOSEPH M. “JOE” JEFFERSON, a retired


Army


(Field Artillery), Policy


Specialist Lieutenant


Colonel


is a Senior Acquisition in the Acquisition and


Industrial Base Policy Directorate of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology. He holds a B.S. in commercial market- ing from South Carolina State University and is Level III certified in program man- agement and in information technology. Jefferson is also a Lean Six Sigma Black Belt and a member of the U.S. Army Acquisition Corps.


ASC.ARMY.MIL 103


EFFICIENCIES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176