search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DELIVERING THE NETWORK


THE AGILE PROCESS The NIEs are led by a triad consisting of the Brigade Modernization Command, the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, and the System of Systems Integration Directorate under the Assis- tant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology.


AERIAL TIER


A 2/1 AD Soldier flies a MAKO Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) flight system during NIE 12.1, the Army’s second NIE, in November 2011. The MAKO, a system under evaluation, provides Soldiers an ISR system that is portable and man- packable while wearing standard current combat equipment; a high-resolution image and full-motion surveillance camera during day and night operations; and a communications repeater capability to increase dismounted patrol range and situational awareness.


Baseline, which allows for insertion of


new technologies through the Agile Pro- cess, the new quick-reaction acquisition methodology to address defined capability gaps and insert new technologies into the overall network. The NIEs have allowed the Army to test capability and establish doctrinal insight on how to extend the network to the edge and enhance mission command on the move.


As we undertake NIE 12.2 in May, the third and most critical of the events thus far, it is valuable to review this progress and chart the path ahead. From the begin- ning, the aim of these exercises was to deliver an integrated Capability Set (CS) of networked equipment to brigade com- bat teams beginning early in FY13, and we intend to hit that target.


24


Held twice a year at White Sands Missile Range, NM, the events assess new net- work capabilities in a robust operational environment to determine whether they perform as needed, conform to the net- work architecture, and are interoperable with existing systems. The NIEs aim to ensure that the network satisfies the func- tional requirements of the force, relieves the end users of the technology integra- tion burden, and produces valuable Soldier feedback on new capabilities.


The first two events, NIE 11.2 in June-July 2011 and NIE 12.1 in October-November 2011, were the largest network field exer- cises the Army has ever held. It was an enormous challenge to train thousands of 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division (2/1 AD) Soldiers to operate dozens of systems while integrating all of the pieces into a newly established network architecture unique to the exercise.


While the brigade, system, and integration engineers, field support representatives, and other personnel involved did an out- standing job completing these tasks on a tight timeline, we have incorporated changes from lessons learned to make the process more efficient and effective as we move forward.


Specifically, we have formalized the Agile Process cycle to ensure that system candi- date assessments, network integration, and configuration are completed at Army lab- oratories before the equipment arrives at Fort Bliss, TX, for integration into tactical


formations and training with the 2/1 AD. At Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, the new command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance through


direct


laboratories fiber-optic


are linked connectiv-


ity, creating an integrated environment for government and industry to measure system performance and interoperabil- ity. Any necessary upgrades can be made before systems are tested in true opera- tional settings, when it is more difficult to adjust them.


We are grateful to our industry partners for their enthusiastic participation in the Agile Process. As the process continues to mature, companies of all sizes will see regular opportunities to demonstrate their network solutions to the Army. Compared with traditional acquisition methods, the Agile Process will allow us to move much faster in procuring and deploying commercial-off-the-shelf products demonstrate operational value.


that


The Army is already using this strategy as it prepares to procure a single-channel, vehicle-mounted radio running the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW). Recently con- ducted NIEs confirmed an operational need for these single-channel radios.


The Agile Process will also be


employed with the upcoming Mid-Tier Networking Vehicular Radio (MNVR) initiative, which seeks to procure a lower-cost replacement for the recently terminated JTRS Ground Mobile Radio (GMR). Designed to harness years of investment and technological progress associated with JTRS GMR develop- ment, this non-developmental item effort radios


aims that to procure can transmit available information


using high-bandwidth, nonproprietary waveforms such as SRW and Wideband


Army AL&T Magazine


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176