search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE ENERGY EDGE Despite this long-standing, critical


role in military might, energy has only recently gained broad attention, leading to systematic management approaches. A September 2009 study by the Army Environmental Policy Institute, Sustain the Mission Project: Casualty Factors for Fuel and Water Resupply Convoys (online at


http://www.aepi.army.mil/docs/


whatsnew/SMP_Casualty_Cost_Fac- tors_Final1-09.pdf), highlighted the risks


to our Soldiers from the extraor-


dinary effort required to deliver fuel to expeditionary forces on the ground, and the vulnerabilities created by our singular dependence on liquid fuel logistics.


In response to these concerns, the Army and Marine Corps each focused efforts to mitigate these issues by fielding more energy-efficient technologies and alterna- tive energy solutions.


PROVEN EFFICIENCIES These efforts have already achieved reduc- tions in field energy consumption, in turn helping to mitigate both the effects of spi- raling energy costs and the need to dedicate military forces


to conduct fuel delivery


convoys in hazardous areas of Southwest Asia. For example, the Army has replaced stand-alone power generation with more than


22 “mini-grids”


WELCOME TO THE ARMY’S


OPERATIONAL ENERGY OFFICE


In November 2011, the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4 (Logistics) established an


Operational


Energy (OE) Office to support the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy, and Environment, who sets Army energy policies and pro- grams and coordinates them with the Office of the Secre- tary of Defense and the other military


departments. This


new office synchronizes Army OE and contingency basing initiatives, and planning and business processes among Army staff elements and commands.


The office supports current in Afghanistan,


saving an estimated 33 million gallons of fuel per year—an efficiency improvement of approximately 20 percent.


However, energy savings are not the ulti- mate goal. The military exists to protect national security and to project power, and energy contributes significantly to those purposes. With that


in mind, it


is important to maintain an operational focus and to define success in terms that reflect mission success.


requirements, making more


For example, more efficient electrical power generation can reduce fuel delivery


20 Soldiers


available to conduct assigned missions— a force multiplier. Saving 5,000 gallons


operations and is now expand- ing its efforts to integrate OE into the Army budget process, the Army Campaign Plan, and other enterprise systems. This work will link overall Army goals of operational readiness and performance with the spe- cific actions needed to achieve those results. For more infor- mation about the Operational Energy Office, contact COL Paul Roege at 571-256-4570 or paul.e.roege.mil@mail.mil; or Amy Burrison at 703-614- 0937 or amy.b.burrison.civ@ mail.mil.


OPERATIONAL BENEFITS For the first time, the Army is about to issue a document that describes energy


requirements Initial in terms of


their operational benefits. A draft of this


and Doctrine Capabilities Document


[ICD] for Operational Energy, prepared in October 2011 by the U.S. Army Training


Command,


characterizes energy as “critical to the Joint Force’s ability to conduct and sup- port operations, enabling maneuver and freedom of action and providing opera- tional reach and endurance.”


In other words, energy-enabled attributes of vehicle speed, onboard power, and endurance provide important operational energy benefit. The ICD also recognizes the dynamic nature of modern operations, noting that “providing energy alterna- tive capabilities


and interoperability


builds flexibility and resilience through increased ability to respond to changes in operational demands, and greater ability to adapt to changes in the opera- tional environment.”


The most important concept presented


in the ICD is the need to understand how energy relates to operational capabilities and to manage energy in ways that best support mission success. This concept, termed “energy-informed operations,” increase


requires in a substantial awareness about energy


use and availability, and an attendant ability to make effective choices that maximize the operational benefit of the energy available.


can take a fuel tanker and crew off the road. Alternative energy sources, such as photovoltaic (solar) panels, can reduce generator operating time, meaning less maintenance effort and a reduced acoustic signature, and reduce the unit’s vulnerability to disruptions in fuel supply.


Army AL&T Magazine


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176