search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
with the equipment, this project is help- ing determine how the Army and DoD can institutionalize micro-grid technolo- gies operationally. Using micro-grids will add discipline in how we power forward operating bases and other outposts, and will help reduce the number of supply convoys traveling to remote areas.


AMMPS IN AFGHANISTAN


Ranging in size from 5 to 60 kilowatts (kW), Advanced Medium Mobile Power Sources are 21 percent more fuel-efficient on average than the TQGs currently deployed to Afghanistan. Pictured is a 5 kW AMMPS generator. (U.S. Army photo.)


automatically powers or shuts off the gen- erators based on that need.


From August to December 2011, the micro-grid operated 24/7 without any power disruptions. The same base oper- ating on TQGs would have experienced power losses totaling approximately 900 hours as generators were pulled off-line for scheduled maintenance. In contrast, micro-grid generators are cycled for main- tenance during periods of low power demand without incurring any disruptions. After operating the micro-grid successfully for four months, PM MEP transitioned it to USFOR-A personnel, who continue to operate the system at Bagram.


The final metrics on the 1 MW micro- grid’s performance, measured by the U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analy- sis Activity, showed 18 percent fuel savings, 86 percent maintenance man-hour savings, and 100 percent power availability, compared with the 13 TQGs.


REMOTE REQUIREMENTS By collecting reliable data on system performance and familiarizing Soldiers


PM MEP recently deployed a new tech- nology to Afghanistan aimed at smaller outposts away from forward operating bases, where the power requirement is too small for a grid with multiple gen- erators. In partnership with the Rapid Equipping Force, PM MEP is supplying several of these locations with a hybrid solution consisting of a TQG, solar pan- els, and energy storage capability through a battery bank.


Essentially, the captured solar energy is used until the power supply is running too low, which triggers the generator to fire up and recharge the battery until the solar capability can resume. This pro- vides continuous power, a quiet option for silent watch periods, and enough fuel savings to reduce resupply missions from once or twice per week to once every two weeks. We have deployed 28 of these systems and will factor the performance results and user feedback into the path ahead for tactical power.


The Network Integration Evaluation 12.2 in May will test-drive a standard- ized


solution to power a company


command post, which is a key Army effort to bring increased network connectivity and mission command systems down to the company level. The PM MEP system under evalu- ation includes a 10 kW power plant (two 10 kW generators on a Light Tactical Trailer), a 15 kW AMMPS gen- erator, and an Improved Environmental Control Unit.


LTC MICHAEL E. FOSTER is DoD’s Product Manager Medium Power Sources. He holds a B.S. in criminal justice from Western Carolina University, an M.S. in human relations from the University of Oklahoma, and an M.A.


We will continue to refine this combination after obtaining Soldier feedback on its performance in a realistic operational environment.


CONCLUSION The requirement for power will never cease in all theaters of operations, as our sophisticated communications technol- ogy cannot function without it.


As it develops the solutions to power the next generation of networked mission com- mand solutions, PM MEP will continue to blend its generator fleet with capabilities that will lessen requirements for fuel and simplify operations for the user.


PM MEP will hold its fifth annual user conference for power professionals from across the services May 8-10 in Orlando, FL. The theme is “Operational Energy to the Warfighter.” Go to http://peoc3t.army. mil/mep for details.


PAUL RICHARD is DoD’s Deputy Proj- ect Manager Mobile Electric Power. He holds a B.S.


in mechanical engineering


from West Virginia University, an M.S. in engineering management from the George Washington University, and an M.S. in national resource strategy from the Indus- trial College of the Armed Forces. He is Level III certified in program management and in systems planning, research, develop- ment, and engineering.


in procure-


ment and acquisition management from Webster University. He is Level III certi- fied in program management and in test and evaluation.


ASC.ARMY.MIL 11


ACQUISITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176