search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE EFFICIENCIES CHALLENGE


ENGAGING THE WORKFORCE After defining the types of CPI projects, the steering committee held workshops to engage the workforce in identifying critical projects and potential opportuni- ties. During this process, one challenge became evident: There was a need to change the culture and the mind-set of the staff, to help them understand that what once seemed


impossible—reduc-


ing waste (non-value-added tasks and activities) and lowering costs while main- taining and improving schedule


and


performance, without disrupting opera- tions—was now achievable.


To guide employees to be more proactive in pursuing efficient solutions in daily operations and to help them become more cognizant of the importance of their individual roles in productively using resources,


the steering


tee developed a set of CPI foundational goals, including:


1. Ensure leadership involvement. 2. Educate every employee about projects that qualify as efficiencies and how those actions benefit the workforce and the Soldier.


3. Ensure that the documentation pro- cess for capturing efficiencies is easy to understand and readily accessible.


4. Train, mentor, and empower employ- ees to be innovative, creative, and motivated to change.


5. Provide incentives to the workforce. 6. Promote collaboration with industry.


LAYING THE FRAMEWORK The next step after the project selection workshop was selecting project leads to develop strategies for individual project implementation and to guide the pro- cess. Finally, tracking mechanisms and documentation procedures were


estab-


lished to monitor the health and progress of each project.


116


“The CPI documentation process is important because it helps us track our progress so we can learn how to bet- ter sustain and mature improvements,” said Barb Dmoch, Process Improvement Lead/CPI Director. “The system is user- friendly for the project leaders and makes it easy for them to record the good work being done to make our organization more efficient.”


An informal mentoring program also ensures that help is available to guide and support organizational leads. CPI strategy experts coach PMO project leads; PEO resource management and cost analysts support their PMO counterpart leads.


commit-


SNAPSHOTS OF SUCCESS An example of a successful CPI proj- ect lies in the initiatives of the Robotic Systems Joint Project Office (RS JPO), under the management of PEO GCS. RS JPO reduced the cost of shipping and storage for robotic assets to be drawn down, while establishing a new process for the disposal


of


robotic systems that are no longer required. Unused robots can be turned in to Defense Logistics Agency Dispo- sition Services, enabling other federal and state entities to make further use of mission-capable equipment. The total cost avoidance for this project was nearly $1.4 million.


Although most projects generally yield a cost savings or avoidance, PEO GCS noticed that some initiatives simply resulted in better business practices, which are also vital to mis- sion success. For example, the Process Conformance Improvement project provided the benefit of establishing an organizational that


checks for


assessment mechanism conformances of key


processes across the PEO. In one case, methodologies to accomplish the


same procedure were reduced from five to one.


CONCLUSION


“Our recent success can be directly related to the leadership of our PEO and PMs (project managers), as well as the dedi- cation and ideas of our employees to identify waste and lower costs,” said Dave Taylor, PEO GCS Better Buying Power Expert. “Our leaders and people delivered excellent results, and we are incorporating best practices to raise the bar this fiscal year.”


PEO GCS is on its way to surpassing its FY11 accomplishments. By January, 56 percent of PEO GCS leaders had completed CPI project sponsor training. An additional


three projects, totaling


more than $50 million in cost savings or avoidance, have been completed to date; 40 more projects are expected to close by the end of FY12.


“We are faced with austere economic conditions that constrain our resources and demand innovative approaches to accomplish our mission,” Davis said.


“We will pioneer efficiency initiatives to do things smarter, faster, better, and at less cost, so we can continue to pro- vide affordable, integrated, and robust ground combat systems and ensure the success of our warfighters.”


For more information on PEO GCS, go to http://www.peogcs.army.mil.


LORI A. GREIN is the Public Affairs Offi- cer for Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems. She holds a B.S. degree and is a graduate of the Defense Infor- mation School. Grein has eight years of government experience in leadership and public relations roles and is an experienced correspondent for Army publications.


Army AL&T Magazine


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176