search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WORKFORCE


providing command guidance, sometimes as young captains and even lieutenants.


Te entirety of Field Manual (FM) 6-0 and Army Doctrine Publi- cation (ADP) 6-0, both titled “Mission Command,” were written expressly to help leaders exercise command and control over often distributed forces to accomplish missions. In the article “Under- standing Mission Command,” James D. Sharpe, Col. USA (Ret.) and Tomas E. Creviston, Lt. Col. USA (Ret.), revisited this and emphasized, “Te doctrinal terms decentralized execution, decen- tralization, and empowering agile and adaptive leadership, all imply the same thing—distributed leadership.”


ADP 6-0 “Mission Command” applies a framework that empow- ers subordinate decision-making and decentralized execution appropriate to the situation that is completely applicable to current methods of working in distributed teams. It was designed for unpredictable and ambiguous environments, and relies on trained, experienced, trusted teams being able to operate inde- pendently on a shared understanding of the commander’s intent.


Te principles of mission command are:


• Create competence. • Establish mutual trust. • Ensure shared understanding. • Provide clear intent. • Issue mission orders. • Prioritize and incentivize disciplined initiative. • Accept risk.


Commanders who read and apply these principles know how to lead in a distributed environment, whether it’s in a forward combat environment or spread over multiple locations while state- side. One could argue that it also provides principles that should apply to an in-person environment, but in-person environments don’t force the issues of trust, competence and disciplined initia- tive the way remote and distributed work does.


Distributed work is not for everyone. Not all work can be taken completely online, not all people possess the communication skills, understanding of intent, and disciplined initiative needed to work on a distributed team, and not all commanders possess the traits and behaviors needed to enable this kind of work.


Distributed teams often reveal these failings. Te good news is that they can be corrected with performance management, mentorship and training.


LOCATION INDEPENDENT SOLUTIONS FOR LOCATION DEPENDENT PROBLEMS John O’Duinn, a renowned expert on distributed teams and distributed work, does not categorize jobs by “remote” or “in-person.” Instead, he focuses on the ties to a location, catego- rizing jobs as “location-dependent” or “location-independent.” Tis method of classifying jobs places less focus on the individual receiving the treatment and more emphasis on the nature of work, and how much that work should be done tied to a particular loca- tion. Some jobs are tied to particular locations, e.g., jobs involving specialty equipment and machinery such as service depots. Some jobs are tied to the location of the team and the services provided. However, only about 40 percent of Army active-duty positions are at the brigade combat team level and below. A large portion of the Army operates in staff positions working digitally, and those jobs can to a great degree be separated from full-time presence at a given location, even if periodic in-person work and travel are required.


Location-independent work and distributed teams also support the retention of individual talent.


Matching these jobs to competent, disciplined, motivated and communicative individuals has the potential to alleviate a large number of location-based challenges that service members face, many of which drive them to exit service:


• The Married Army Couples Program (MACP). MACP was established in 1983 and provides Soldiers the opportunity to be stationed together while fulfill- ing the Army’s mission. About 22,000 active component Soldiers are currently enrolled in the program. If both service members are assigned to a duty location supporting the service member whose position is more


https:// asc.ar my.mil


117


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132