search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


vehicle excursion. Most importantly, the Soldier feedback received at vehicle excursions is the only Soldier touch point for ground platforms at the system-of-systems level before nonrecurring engineering. Tis final “gut check” ensures that information dimension nonrecurring engi- neering funding is improving access to relevant real-time information and reducing cognitive load, truly making Soldiers more lethal on the battlefield.


NECESSARY PREPARATIONS


Soldiers with 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division wear upgraded IVAS goggles while sitting inside a Stryker armored vehicle preparing for a movement-to-contact urban raid exercise in August 2022 on Joint Base Lewis-McChord.


CONCLUSION Te pace of modernization and rearmament is accelerating across the globe. System-of-systems integration, standardization and mature prototype excursions are critical enablers to accelerate our own modernization. Te lessons learned from VE3 will improve modernization of information dimension systems as the Army moves toward Army 2030. Te tactical benefits of new systems need to outweigh the overall cost of using them in terms of added Soldier load, reliability, ease of use, training time, access to train- ing and sustainability. Future vehicle excursions will continue to bring this type of wisdom into the Army acquisition process.


computers and other new technology. Led by PEO GCS and co-developed by all the PEOs represented at VE3, SAVE will enable more rapid modernization, because new SAVE-compliant systems will already be compati- ble with SAVE-compliant vehicles.


• Te final key effort mitigating integration risks are the vehicle excursions. An important distinction and unique value of vehicle excursions is the focus on mature technol- ogies. While Project Convergence and other technology demonstration events have proven valuable at demonstrat- ing what is in the art of the possible, vehicle excursions operate in a post-Project Convergence environment with mature technology—answering the question, “What are we really going to fund for modernization, how does it all connect, and does it work as advertised?” Installing multiple systems on platforms in an operational environ- ment quickly brings out the technical and programmatic “warts,” allowing much faster redesign more affordably, while providing a government-owned technical data package at the system-of-systems level at the end of the


LT. COL. NICHOLAS BREEN, product lead for PEO GCS Ground Combat Platform Integration, has an M.A. in liberal arts from Johns Hopkins University, a B.A. in political science from the University of Nebraska, and will be attending the Eisenhower School for Senior Service College. He served as an assistant product manager at PEO Soldier, has served on the staff of the assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, logistics and technology, and is currently serving as the product lead for integration of C5ISR products onto ground combat platforms.


CAPT. MAX MEINERT is the outgoing company commander for Bravo Company, 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division. He has a B.S. in military history from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He commissioned as an infantry officer in 2013 and is in the process of transitioning to strategist. He has served in the 1st Battalion, 508th Parachute Infantry Regiment, U.S. Army Europe G-5, Special Operations Joint Task Force ‒ Afghanistan, 1-2 Stryker Brigade Combat Team and the Stryker Warfighters’ Forum.


DAVID MORRIS, PH.D., is a network integration engineer and the lead for MITRE support to PEO GCS assisting with combat vehicle modernization. He holds a Ph.D. and an M.S. in electromagnetics with a minor in communications, and a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Michigan.


https://asc.ar my.mil


63


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132