search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WIELDING EXCALIBUR


CLOSE INSPECTION


A U.S. Army Soldier inspects an M982A1 Excalibur round prior to it being loaded into an M777 howitzer for a live-fire training event in June 2020 on Fort Polk, Louisiana (now Fort Johnson). The Excalibur projectile allows Ukrainian forces increased firepower while decreasing the risk to their own troops. (Photo by Staff Sgt. Ashley Morris, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division)


Once the team successfully crafted the training package, we faced our next obstacle: Because Excalibur had yet to be officially named on a presidential draw- down, the team lacked a mechanism to satisfy foreign disclosure requirements and to provide training materials to the UAF. To clear this hurdle, PdM PACM worked with Joint Multinational Group Ukraine and the Royal Canadian Artillery to ensure that the training was delivered in a timely manner.


40 Army AL&T Magazine Summer 2023


LOGISTICS AND ONGOING SUPPORT Once the Excalibur projectile was offi- cially named on a presidential drawdown, moving the munitions from U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps stocks to theater was straightforward, with the assistance of JMC. Once PM CAS, in conjunction with PM Ammunition (U.S. Marine Corps), identified the lots of Excalibur that would be used to source the presidential draw- down requirements, Joint Munitions


Command executed its mission of moving the munitions seamlessly. Unfortunately, because PEFCS is not a U.S. Army end item, there was no simple mechanism for moving them into theater.


In response to this challenge, PdM PACM worked with TACOM, and before the execution date established by the presiden- tial drawdown, developed an executable process for moving PEFCS from Pica- tinny Arsenal, New Jersey, to the shipping


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132