search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


Without an adequate supply of water, the Army ammunition plants could not operate.


valves; new motors; variable frequency drives (for pump motors); motor control center with switchgears; and new flow meters. BAE Systems completed this $17.8 million upgrade in March.


It is critical for facilities to meet ammunition production require- ments while ensuring workforce safety, especially for those involved in inherently dangerous explosives operations. Recent years have seen a significant amount of modernization fund- ing aimed at recapitalizing the Army ammunition plants. In these aging facilities, unique equipment used for explosive and energetic materials is experiencing unplanned downtime or even obsolescence because it has aged beyond the point where mainte- nance can ensure production continuity. Terefore, construction of new facilities is critical for enabling continued production of ammunition.


Tis is especially evident at Holston Army Ammunition Plant in Tennessee where a recent expansion project will upgrade and rebuild multiple explosives production processes for the increased production of RDX—the most commonly used synthetic chem- ical compound that can be used as a base charge for detonators among other uses—and HMX, which explodes at temperatures above 534 degrees. Improvements include a new nitration facil- ity where crude explosives are generated, a new melt-cast facility for the manufacture of insensitive munitions explosives formu- lations (munitions designed to withstand shock from adjacent detonating munitions) and a new kettle drying operation, which will increase drying capacity for CMX-7 a premix for PBXN-107 (a plastic-bonded explosive), bomb fill, as well as other explosives.


CONCLUSION Increased funding levels required to maintain the Army ammu- nition plants is necessary based on production requirements and the amount of recapitalization needed to modernize these facil- ities for the future. Impacts from global events, supply chain disruptions and inflation have made strategic planning and reliable budget estimating more important. Te Army ammu- nition plant modernization plan provides a strategic investment


https://asc.ar my.mil 105


strategy to ensure ammunition manufacturing readiness now and in the future.


For more information, contact Matthew T. Zimmerman, matthew.t.zimmerman2.civ@army.mil.


MATTHEW T. ZIMMERMAN supports the JPEO A&A Project Director for Joint Services. He is responsible for an annual procurement and research, development, test and evaluation budget for the GOCO Army ammunition plant acquisition strategies


and modernization program, demilitarization


program, manufacturing technology and prototyping activities, and integrating the DOD’s Single Manager for Conventional Ammunition responsibilities. He has a master’s in engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology, a master’s in technology management from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School & Moore School and a B.S. in mechanical engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. He has completed the Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government program and the Defense Acquisition University Senior Service College Fellowship. He is a certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt and holds the DAWIA Advanced program management certification.


GABRIELA DORY, Ph.D., supports the Project Director for Joint Services. She has over 15 years of civil service with the U.S. Army supporting research, development, test and evaluation, acquisition and program management for the industrial base, including expertise in environmental permitting and production base management support. She has a Ph.D. in environmental science from the New Jersey Institute of Technology, an M.S. in environmental and waste management from Stony Brook University and a B.S. in biology from Union College.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148