search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE POWER OF SOLDIER FEEDBACK


operations. Leaders and developers are working with PEO GCS to incorporate these lessons learned, with the understanding that integrating modern equipment onto the unit’s legacy flat-bottom Strykers could result in power issues. Future capability-set field- ings planned with other units take this issue into account, and the Integrated Tactical Network will be integrated into more modern vehicles.


Te capability-set team will continue to work with the 2nd Cavalry Regiment to identify potential options using legacy vehicles.


TRAINING WITHOUT END Troughout the CS21 and CS23 fielding, the 3rd Squadron, 2nd Calvary Regiment has received new equipment training from PEO C3T. Because of this support, the unit has been able to conduct its own training and troubleshoot network equipment when needed.


“My Soldiers were in five months of solid classes and actively working with the equipment to learn it from the inside out,” Mock said. “We’ve gotten to the point where we’re less reliant and dependent on the field service representatives. We can handle the technical issues ourselves.”


CALLING ALL UNITS


The PRC-162 Manpack radio and PRC-163 Leader Radio for dismounted operations at work during the exercise. (Photo by Kathryn Bailey, PEO C3T Public Affairs)


Te leadership and development teams under PEO C3T have learned holistically that by applying those training lessons learned from CS21 into CS23, Army schoolhouses must be brought in to begin institutionalizing training across the force as more units continue to receive capability set fielding.


It provided a great perspective about how ITN communica- tions works and how we were able to communicate across long distances while making a large-scale movement.”


Unit leaders compared using CS21 versus CS23 in their recent live-fire exercise. “Between our initial CS21 Integrated Tacti- cal Network fielding and CS23 Ops Demo, the key points we brought up, whether large-scale problems or small, such as plac- ing a button in a certain place, have been implemented,” Mock said. “We see noticeable improvements between the two, that are benefiting us.”


One area identified for additional improvement during Ops Demo 1 was power requirements for the Strykers under certain operational conditions; specifically, the unit could not maintain power during the silent watch portion of the exercise where the Strykers shut off engines and run on batteries while doing night


58


However, institutionalized training is not limited to the units receiving the full network kit. More than 300 additional units have or will have specific components, such as radios, that are referred to as capability-set-enabling equipment. Tese units still require the appropriate equipment training to enable communi- cations and information sharing across formations.


Soldier feedback is making a difference institutionally, not only with technology, maturity and operational relevance, but also with guidance on how Soldiers should receive initial and refresher training.


CONCLUSION Te capability-set process has turned the old way of technology development and fielding upside down. In the case of CS23, it is no longer acceptable to hand a kit over to a platform unit and tell them, “Tis is your network; make it fit in your vehicles.”


Army AL&T Magazine Fall 2022


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148