A BETTER BUNKER
on this research and have received interest on implementing its recommendations.
“Our main goal is always to protect the warfighter.”
core competency in blast and weapons effects on structures. It also benefitted from the research organization’s cross-laboratory environment. For example, ERDC used its 3D printing capa- bilities to quickly produce unique instrumentation mounts that simulated a human head for field testing. Meanwhile, ERDC’s work in invasive species and fish migration allowed the team to pull in a biologist with enough knowledge of brain injuries to better interface with the experts at the Medical Research and Development Command.
CENTCOM commander, Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., recognized this effort by thanking the ERDC team for its “extraordinary work on the Personnel Bunker Study.”
“Te recent attack on U.S. personnel at Al Asad Air Base served as a reminder of the very real dangers our military members face carrying out their daily missions,” McKenzie wrote. “I am confident that your study findings will reduce the risks posed to our military and will ultimately save lives. ERDC and the Army Corps of Engineers continue to be valuable members of the (CENTCOM) team and combat multipliers across my area of responsibility.”
Te team that completed the Personnel Bunker Study was also recognized with a 2022 Innovation of the Year award from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
CONCLUSION Because the USACE Transatlantic Division supports engineering activities across the joint forces in CENTCOM’s area of respon- sibility, this solution was applied broadly.
Te U.S. Air Force has begun implementation of these specific designs and configurations for their applications as well.
ERDC and the USACE Transatlantic Division have briefed lead- ers within the U.S. Africa and U.S. Indo-Pacific Commands
86 Army AL&T Magazine Fall 2022
Additionally, the knowledge gained regarding protection from traumatic brain injury has driven additional efforts from the USACE Protective Design Center and assisted in the understand- ing and development of new training and safety concerns being addressed by the U.S. Army Counter Explosive Hazards Center.
Te blast data also will be provided to the medical community for future traumatic brain injury research.
“Tis project was very different from others I have worked on in that it was a very specific but very challenging problem where we had to find a deployable solution with very limited time,” said Catie Stephens, Ph.D., the director of ERDC’s International Research Office. “Tis project could have required hundreds of experiments to better understand the problem, but we were able to do a very small set of large experiments that allowed us to solve the main request, a retrofit to bunkers that decreases the risk of traumatic brain injury, while also gathering data that is valuable for solving the problem—how and why blast-induced traumatic brain injuries occur. All of that data was shared with the Medi- cal Research and Development Command in order for them to make progress on the bigger problem.”
For more information, email
ERDCInfo@usace.army.mil or go to
https://www.erdc.usace.army.mil/Locations/GSL.aspx.
TIM REEVES is a communications specialist with the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Prior to joining ERDC’s
corporate communications team, Reeves spent nearly
three decades in journalism working as a photographer, reporter and editor at newspapers throughout the southeast United States.
CHRIS KIEFFER is a communications specialist with ERDC. He spent more than a decade as a reporter and editor with the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal and Oxford (Mississippi) Eagle newspapers. Kieffer holds an M.A. in journalism from Columbia University and a B.A. in journalism from the University of Mississippi.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148