search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CRITICAL THINKING


STEM DAY UNDERWAY


Greg Chappelle, left, with cadets at a STEM DAY camp Aug. 5, 2021, at Fort Custer. At these camp sessions, kids are encouraged to explore their interests in the fields of science, technology, engineering, art and math. (Photo by Jerome Aliotta, DEVCOM Ground Vehicle Systems Center)


of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) to keep the program going, however, he knew he’d need to find a way to keep the momen- tum for the long term. “In order to get more funding for the program, the OSD needed some metrics to show data on how their investment was working,” he said. Although it was a reasonable request, show- ing hard statistics was no easy task. So he consulted with the National Science Foun- dation. Te NSF suggested there would only be “longitudinal results” with this kind of study. In other words, he chuck- led, “you won’t know the results until 20 years from now, when the kids grow up, graduate and go into their careers, which would be a long wait.”


But Chappelle has been with the DOD for 40 years. He knows the drill—so to speak. Te only real way to measure the program’s success rate was to seek


outside assistance in developing metrics. So he sought support from Harvard University, which “promotes university- wide engagement with Native American and Indigenous issues . . . through rele- vant research, teaching, partnership and exchange” through its Harvard Univer- sity Native American Program (HUNAP). Te overall goal of HUNAP is “to culti- vate the development, achievement, and impact of American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and other Indig- enous students to further the goals of the Harvard Charter of 1650, which commit- ted the president and fellows of Harvard College to “the education of the English and Indian youth of this country.”


OBVIOUS BENEFITS Te Harvard assessment compared the grade point averages (GPAs) of the kids who attended the GLRTN STEM camp


for eight or nine years against those who never attended at all to get an idea of the differentials. According to Chappelle there was “a pretty significant difference.” Te kids who enrolled in the camp had a 3.43 GPA average, as opposed to a 2.94 GPA for the kids who didn’t. In addition to GPAs, he said “Te kids that enrolled in the camp and were trained by us had direction and a clear career path, and the kids who didn’t enroll had little to no direction and were undecided in their major.”


Te metric assessment showed obvious benefits, and Chappelle is hopeful that funding will continue for the program to flourish. He said to date he’s received fund- ing every few years to keep the program afloat, but the struggle is ongoing. In 2010, the OSD issued a $400,000 grant to continue funding the GLRTN STEM program. Subsequent grants followed


https://asc.ar my.mil


109


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148