search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WORKFORCE


working intimately with the program manager and support staff to learn as much about the program as I possibly could so I could relay a clear, concise and consistent message to Congress.


We develop what are called Army program budget briefs—presentations to the Senate and House appropriations committees— to outline the Army’s position regarding the upcoming fiscal year requirements. It is our opportunity to explain how and what each program or product manage- ment office did with the money Congress appropriated to our programs last year. Tat might include how many systems we procured or key test events that took place.


We also defend and justify what program management offices can and cannot do with the funding originally planned for in the program objective memorandum, based on potential increases or decreases to the overall defense budget. After the briefings, we respond to requests for infor- mation related to our programs throughout the end of the budget cycle, when both the Senate and House pass the defense appro- priation for the next fiscal year.


OTHER DUTIES Aside from those briefs, the DASC builds relationships with the program managers and helps them resolve complex prob- lems with their programs by navigating assistance from Army senior leaders and staff functional offices. For instance, the secretary of the Army was asked during congressional testimony about active protection systems. Since it pertained to one of my programs, the Vehicle Protec- tion Suite, it was my job to work with the program manager to draft an informa- tion paper related to this topic so that the secretary was aware of the current state and could provide a formal response to Congress on this topic if necessary.


We also play an integral part when a program has a milestone-decision review, by assisting the program office with coor- dinating meetings with key players and decision-makers. Te DASCs also host the milestone-decision review meeting, take notes and respond to any after- action reports or follow-up questions. Midway through my DASC assignment, I was asked to do just that and assist the Mobile Protected Firepower program to attain final approval for its milestone C so it could award a low-rate initial production contract. It was an exciting time for both the program and the Army as it was the first acquisition program to successfully transition from a middle-tier acquisition pathway to a major-capability acquisition pathway. And while most of the legwork had been accomplished before my involve- ment, assisting with those final briefings helped me gain a better appreciation and understanding of the life-cycle process we are involved in daily.


CONCLUSION My six-month tour at the Pentagon and the experience I received in OASA(ALT) as a DASC were invaluable and helped to broaden and deepen my skills as an acquisition professional. I learned how to maneuver the ins and outs of the acquisi- tion process, from down at the program and product manager and PEO levels up through the upper chain of command at Army headquarters.


Te LEAD program has allowed me to explore the opportunities in Army acqui- sition that are outside of my career path. For someone looking for a change, it is a great program to consider. My DASC assignment has helped me build a back- ground of knowledge and information, as well as a network of contacts to make me successful in any Army acquisition program or product team I join in the future. It will certainly make me a more


LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE AND ACQUISITION DEVELOPMENT


LEAD (Image by USAASC)


effective leader because of my understand- ing of the larger Army mission as it relates to acquisition and getting capabilities into Soldiers’ hands.


For more information about the LEAD program, go to https://asc.army.mil/web/ career-development/programs/lead/.


CODY SWINFORD has worked for the Army for 25 years, including four years on active duty as an enlisted Soldier, and supported multiple PEOs


and program


and product management offices, including PEO Aviation, PEO Ground Combat Systems and PEO Missiles and Space. He is


currently participating in the LEAD


program. In September, he transitioned to Phase III, and is assigned to the Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office at Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama. He has an M.S. in management, acquisition and contracts from the Florida Institute of Technology and a B.S. in secondary education from Athens State University. He holds the DAWIA Advanced certifications


in business, cost estimating


and business, financial management, and the Practitioner certification in program management.


https:// asc.ar my.mil 129


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148