search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ACHIEVABLE REQUIREMENTS


AMPV requirements were reviewed, strengthened and validated by the Army, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Staff. Te Army also solic- ited industry feedback through industry days and requests for information, which led to cost-informed trade-offs to relax or reduce some requirements.


Another recent success is the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) program, which won the David Packard Excellence in Acquisition Award in 2013 for cost- saving measures identified by working collaboratively with the


requirements BALANCING REQUIREMENTS


With senior Army leadership involved from the start, the requirements process for the AMPV program concentrated on the capabilities needed to ensure its mission success within the armored brigade combat team while specifically refining capabilities that support mobility and protection. (Photo courtesy of Program Executive Office for Ground Combat Systems)


community to achieve affordability. Dur- ing the JLTV’s technology development phase,


the Army conducted a cost-


informed trade assessment that examined design options, requirements and afford- ability. Tis program is an example of the success the Army can achieve by defining realistic requirements in partnership with industry.


INSTILLING COLLABORATION Te Army has taken the initiative to institutionalize these value-added processes to ensure more successful acquisition outcomes. Drawing guidance from Better Buying Power 2.0 initiatives, ASA(ALT) signed the implementation memorandum in August 2014 requiring


KNOWLEDGE FLOW


The U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center (AMRDEC) industry day in December 2014 provided a forum where stakeholders and other interested parties could exchange information and learn about best practices. The goal was to boost industry productivity and provide affordable military capabilities to the warfighter. (Photo by Bill Crawford, AMRDEC Public Affairs)


“knowledge point” reviews at key junc- tures in the development of all major acquisition programs. Tis in-depth process establishes a forum for critical review of a system’s proposed specifica- tions for program technical risks, cost and viability. Tese reviews allow Army leadership to judge the realism of require- ments as a function of cost, schedule and technical risks before Milestone B. Iden- tifying performance trade-offs in this way ensures that the program remains affordable and achievable.


8


Army AL&T Magazine


July-September 2015


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156