search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
engineers work to reduce the sustainment burden by analyzing support structures for each system design and selecting those that emphasize reduced manpower requirements, modularity, reliability and use of existing tools and facilities.


Good communication skills are also vital for logistics engineers to validate a process into products or systems. “Logis- ticians and engineers are not wired the same way,” Chronister


said. “Logistics


engineers have to be good communica- tors and be that consensus builder with their people skills and credibility.”


RECENT SUCCESSES Te program has generated a number of cost-effective solutions. For example, the Black Hawk Project Office found that having an engineer working with their logistics team improved the integration of the engineering and logistics capabili- ties and helped them better execute their mission.


Recently the logistics engineering team provided a break-even analysis on the UH-60 main rotor hub. Te issue was whether purchasing new rotor hubs was more cost-effective than overhauling the existing obsolete ones. Te team com- pared the life-cycle costs, and determined it would be more expensive in the imme- diate future to buy new hubs. After five years, however, the model indicated that the cost of buying new hubs would break even with the cost of overhauling the obsolete hubs. After 12 years, overhaul- ing the obsolete hubs proved to be $11.51 million more costly.


Logistics engineers have also helped the UH-60 program reduce sustainment costs through the implementation of new technologies, including cold spray, a method of suspending metals or other materials in gas, then spraying the gas


on damaged machine parts at supersonic speeds, reducing repair times.


Te UH-60 logistics engineering team lead chaired an integrated product team (IPT) to transition new cold spray repair technology to aviation components. A transmission sump pan, a component of the gearbox housing, was chosen from the salvage yard as the test component. Te team sprayed, tested and qualified the pan with an immediate cost avoid- ance of roughly $17,000. Te sump pan would have been disposed of if not for the work of the IPT.


Te fallout rate for the transmission sump alone is roughly four per year, which trans- lates to a cost avoidance of about $68,000 annually with the cold spray technol- ogy. Te repair techniques identified in this test will be applied in the future to components experiencing similar dam- age and, if applied to the other gearbox housing components, this technology could achieve a savings of $3.5 million. Earlier this year, AMRDEC’s Fernando


“Rios” Merritt, the Black Hawk logistics engineering team lead, won a Defense Manufacturing Technology Achievement Award for his work to integrate cold spray technology into Army systems.


STEADY GROWTH SUPPORTING SOLDIERS Since its inception, the logistics engineer- ing program has grown steadily, from two engineers supporting the Black Hawk program in 2009 to 19 engineers sup- porting 12 organizations today, including the Chinook, Lakota and Apache heli- copter programs, close combat weapon systems and unmanned aircraft systems.


“Much of the success goes to the first two logistics engineers, Merritt and Chad Reeves, and the immediate impact they made in the first pilot of this capability in the Black Hawk Project Office,” said


Lou Sciaroni, AMRDEC Logistics Engi- neering Branch Chief. “However, each of the successive team members has contin- ued this line of excellence and through their efforts has helped the team evolve to where it is today.”


“Te logistics engineering program here at AMRDEC is unique because we are sup- porting the warfighter in a very real way,” said Merritt. “A lot of times you don’t see the fruits of your labor, but when techni- cal solutions are made on behalf of the Soldier, you know your team has a direct impact on whether that Soldier has every- thing he or she needs to continue and complete their mission.”


CONCLUSION AMRDEC logistics engineers help reduce life-cycle costs, enhance opera- tional capability and optimize support infrastructure through their impact on design and logistics efforts. Teir know- ledge helps technicians, logisticians and other engineers to take advantage of new capabilities and incorporate them into their processes.


“Te program is growing, and AMRDEC logistics


engineers will continue to


impact the life-cycle costs of Army weapon systems, and ultimately the war- fighter, through their engineering efforts and their focus on improving support- ability,” said Sciaroni.


For more information, go to http://www. amrdec.army.mil/AMRDEC/.


MS.CARLOTTA MANEICE is a program analyst


for


Intuitive Research and Tech-


nology and provides program support for AMRDEC Public Affairs. She has an MBA and a B.A. in communication from the University of Mary Hardin-Baylor.


+ ASC.ARMY.MIL 59


LOGISTICS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156