search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
the power management issues have been widespread and clearly articulated, they were not comprehensively addressed or resolved because no single organization “owned” the issue.


Te Power-DWG’s recommendation includes Army-specific adjustments to DOTMLPF-P domains that will not only facilitate a joint power distribu- tion solution, but will also improve the


Army’s ability to exploit advanced power generation, management and distribu- tion systems


in the future. Te team’s


nonmateriel recommendations also rein- force the importance of an integrated DOTMLPF-P solution, rather than sim- ply a technology acquisition.


CONCLUSION As


an Army officer, I have come to understand that the prescribed approach


GEN David G. Perkins, TRADOC commander, and LTG H.R. McMaster, ARCIC director, recently reiterated the need for this collaboration in the capa- bility development process, to include all key stakeholders, program executive offi- cers and project managers alike. Finally, as is often the case, the Army can apply lessons learned from industry, whose best practices reinforce early collaboration in the design process. A common example of an industry tool for early collaboration is use-case development. Tis process maps and analyzes the end user’s interac- tions with the system, ensuring that end users’ needs are represented and planned for early in the development process.


Te Power-DWG continues to meet and find the best systems acquisition approach to power management—one that balances cost, schedule, performance and the needs of the services.


MULTIPLE CHALLENGES PM E2S2’s Power-DWG found that the Army has well-documented nonmateriel challenges that affect its ability to effectively manage power. The result: Army units often lack organic power man- agers with the training and expertise to effectively employ today’s power systems. (Photo courtesy of PEO CS&CSS)


MAJ ANDREW MILLER is a former infantry officer completing his first tour as an Army acquisition officer. He is currently assigned as an assistant product manager for large power sources under PEO CS&CSS’ PM E2S2, Fort Belvoir, VA. He holds an MBA from Southeastern Louisiana University and a B.A. in business administration from Louisiana State University.


to capability development is not always strictly followed. Personnel and organiza- tions generally understand the benefits of close partnerships between stakeholders in the materiel and capability worlds; however, they too often allow conflict- ing priorities and limited resources to get in the way. Army leaders recognize the importance of this integration and often challenge organizations to strive for it.


ASC.ARMY.MIL


109


COMMENTARY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156