search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ENGINEERING LOGISTICS


THE BENEFITS OF TEAMING


A technician performs a system check in the cockpit of a UH-72A Lakota at the Redstone Army Airfield in Huntsville, AL, in March. The logistics engineering program demonstrated that pairing an engineer with the logistics team improved the integration of the engineering and logistics capabilities and helped Soldiers execute their mission more effectively. (Photo by Joseph Carmichael)


engineering project in 2003 after identifying the need to pur- chase numerous, costly aviation replacement parts.


“Ken Dulaney, former chief of the AMCOM Industrial Opera- tions Division, and I discussed getting our engineers to better analyze the costs of the replacement parts and determine what solution we could provide to the item managers while reducing the cost to the taxpayer,” Chronister said.


Dulaney, Chronister and others met with AMCOM, the PEOs and AMRDEC to discuss the idea of using logistics engineer- ing to solve similar issues with other organizations prior to the start of operations in Afghanistan and Iraq but encountered cultural challenges within the functions of logistics and engi- neering. Te two disciplines were organizationally stovepiped, he explained, with little interaction between the two. Each orga- nization had a different culture and a “this is the way we have always done things” mentality. Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom and the high cost of aviation sustainment forced the two to come together, but the cultures clashed. “Te cultures were very strong and change was difficult,” Chronister


56 Army AL&T Magazine July-September 2015


added. “But if you really want to do good things for the Army and our Soldiers, you have to be adaptable and you have to be open to change.”


PILOT PROGRAM TAKES OFF After five years of discussions and meetings, a formal working group was established in 2008 to develop the approach that culminated in a pilot program with the UH-60 Black Hawk program office.


“Data, people and leadership were the keys in getting the pilot program off the ground,” Chronister said. Te team had to identify what was being replaced at what interval and at what cost to perform the proper return-on-investment analysis to determine if it was more economical to continue to buy as-is or invest in redesign, he explained. “And everyone had to be com- fortable enough to understand we were a team trying to save the Army money and get a better product for our Soldiers.”


“Te initial response from our weapon system team members and logisticians was ‘I don’t need a logistics engineer,’ ” said


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156